1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(97)00115-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary electrophoresis methodology for identification of cancer related gene expression patterns of fluorescent differential display polymerase chain reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mixture was denatured at 95°C for two minutes, and analysed through a DNA Sequencing Polymer (Applied Biosystems) with an ABI PRISM Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems), according to a previous method. 25 Data were analysed using Genescan 310 Software (Applied Biosystems).…”
Section: Clonality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixture was denatured at 95°C for two minutes, and analysed through a DNA Sequencing Polymer (Applied Biosystems) with an ABI PRISM Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems), according to a previous method. 25 Data were analysed using Genescan 310 Software (Applied Biosystems).…”
Section: Clonality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorting by molecular weight was originally performed using gel electrophoresis but is nowadays carried out by capillary electrophoresis 7, 25. Originally, radioactive or optical labels were applied in four different terminator reactions (each sorted and read out separately), but today four different fluorophores, one per nucleotide (A, C, G, and T) are used in a single reaction 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In further development of fluorescent DDRT-PCR, labeling random primers [12] was replaced by labeling anchored primers and capillary DNA sequencers were used for cDNA fragment detection [9,10,23]. Although the use of Genotyper Genetic Analysis software (Perking-Elmer ABI) facilitated semi-automatic recognition of unique bands (e.g., bands present in the treated sample but missing in the control), quantitative evaluation of data has not been demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%