1938
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1938.00021962003000070005x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary Conductivity of Peat Soils at Different Capillary Tensions1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1942
1942
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the conductivity for the peat soils is lower at low moisture contents than for the mineral soils but is higher in the region near saturation. This conclusion is verified by the capillary conductivity measurements of Richards and Wilson (4) and also of Wilson and Richards (7). In the region of 200 to 300 em of water tension, the woody peats studied by the latter authors were found to conduct water much more slowly than a loam and more slowly than a sand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This indicates that the conductivity for the peat soils is lower at low moisture contents than for the mineral soils but is higher in the region near saturation. This conclusion is verified by the capillary conductivity measurements of Richards and Wilson (4) and also of Wilson and Richards (7). In the region of 200 to 300 em of water tension, the woody peats studied by the latter authors were found to conduct water much more slowly than a loam and more slowly than a sand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The measurements mostly cover a limited range from saturation to a suction of 100 to 200 cm (RICHARDS and WILSON, 1936;WILSON and RICHARDS, 1938;CHRISTENSEN, 1944;RICHARDS and MOORE, 1952;NIELSEN a.o. 1960;BUTIJN, 1961;TALSMA, 1963;RUBIN a.o., 1964).…”
Section: Soil Physical Aspects Of Evapotranspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in the readiness with which soils absorb and transmit water as the moisture content of the soil is decreased, limits the use of auto-irrigators to the wet end of the plant growth moisture range. WLsON and RICHARDS (13) have summarized the experimental data on this subject. A decrease of a few per cent.…”
Section: Experiments With Ten-inch Potsmentioning
confidence: 99%