2019
DOI: 10.1101/19012229
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAPICE: a computational method for Consequence-Agnostic Pathogenicity Interpretation of Clinical Exome variations

Abstract: Exome sequencing is now mainstream in clinical practice, however, identification of pathogenic Mendelian variants remains time consuming, partly because limited accuracy of current computational prediction methods leaves much manual classification. Here we introduce CAPICE, a new machine-learning based method for prioritizing pathogenic variants, including SNVs and short InDels, that outperforms best general (CADD, GAVIN) and consequence-type-specific (REVEL, ClinPred) computational prediction methods, for bot… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for the low diagnostic yield are variants of uncertain significance that may contribute to pathogenicity, but for which we lack sufficient evidence to determine their role. Databases of variant-tophenotype links like ClinVar [53] and variant prediction tools like CADD [54], Capice [55], and ClinPred [56] can help to annotate variants. Extending the list of disease genes to physiologically relevant enhancers and identifying their target genes will facilitate evaluating the clinical relevance of de novo mutations and their classification as benign or pathogenic.…”
Section: Interpreting Mutations Located In Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for the low diagnostic yield are variants of uncertain significance that may contribute to pathogenicity, but for which we lack sufficient evidence to determine their role. Databases of variant-tophenotype links like ClinVar [53] and variant prediction tools like CADD [54], Capice [55], and ClinPred [56] can help to annotate variants. Extending the list of disease genes to physiologically relevant enhancers and identifying their target genes will facilitate evaluating the clinical relevance of de novo mutations and their classification as benign or pathogenic.…”
Section: Interpreting Mutations Located In Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this data cannot be shared due to patient privacy concerns. Training and testing data with label and predictions from CAPICE and tested predictors and the pre-computed scores for all possible SNVs and InDels are available online at Zenodo [51]: https:// zenodo.org/record/3928295 and at GitHub: https://github.com/molgenis/ capice.…”
Section: Availability and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the clinical utility of KidneyNetwork, we applied GADO 6 to data from 13 patients with a suspected hereditary kidney disease but no genetic diagnosis, using KidneyNetwork as the input matrix. For each patient, we identified which genes prioritized by GADO with KidneyNetwork overlap with genes containing potentially pathogenic variants predicted by CAPICE 22 . The resulting gene lists contained 1−4 candidate genes for 9 of the 13 patients (supplementary table 6) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their phenotype, HPO terms were assigned to these cases by two physicians from the genetics department. For each patient, the complete exome sequencing data were reanalyzed using CAPICE 22 to identify potentially pathogenic variants. Genes containing variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.005 and a recall ≥ 99%, corresponding with a mild CAPICE cut-off of ≥ 0.0027, were considered interesting candidates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%