2018
DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30297-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capecitabine versus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (JCOG0910): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
36
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A means for choosing the most suitable oral FU for each patient, outside of the profile of toxicity, has been sought. A recent Japanese RCT, JCOG0910, 18 failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DFS of S-1 to that of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. However, OS of the two groups was quite similar, and in the subgroup analysis, S-1 showed better DFS than capecitabine in the patient subgroup having tumours with poorly differentiated histology, 18 as shown in our study ( figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A means for choosing the most suitable oral FU for each patient, outside of the profile of toxicity, has been sought. A recent Japanese RCT, JCOG0910, 18 failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DFS of S-1 to that of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. However, OS of the two groups was quite similar, and in the subgroup analysis, S-1 showed better DFS than capecitabine in the patient subgroup having tumours with poorly differentiated histology, 18 as shown in our study ( figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another trial determined that S-1 for stage III colon cancer is non-inferior to UFT/LV [12]. However, it remains unclear as to which oral 5-FU is the most effective, especially in older patients [13]. These findings should be interpreted with consideration to several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately one-fourth of incident colon cancer patients present with node-positive stage III disease [8]. Stage III colon cancer patients have a high risk of recurrence after undergoing curative resection, [2,3] and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the effectiveness of various adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for these patients [9][10][11][12][13]. However, clinical studies that evaluate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy tend to have a selection bias toward younger patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] In Japan, oral fluoropyrimidines such as capecitabine, tegafur-uracil and leucovorin (UFT/LV), and S-1 have been preferred because oral fluoropyrimidines alone demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients with stage III colon cancer, most of whom underwent D3 lymph node dissection (3-year disease-free survival [DFS] rate, 70.0%-82.0%), in Japanese randomized trials, and their treatment is convenient and associated with mild toxicities. [4][5][6][7] However, stage III disease includes subgroups of patients with very poor outcomes. In the ACTS-CC trial, the 3-year DFS rate in patients with stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC disease who received UFT/LV were 87.9%, 74.2%, and 46.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%