2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capecitabine in early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, most patients receiving NAT did not go on to receive AT given the lack of available options at the time. With new evidence to support the use of adjuvant capecitabine among patients with residual TNBC post-NAT, 39 an increase in the use of NAT and postoperative capecitabine is expected. 40,41 A remarkable 80% of patients with stage I-III TNBC in our study received RT.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, most patients receiving NAT did not go on to receive AT given the lack of available options at the time. With new evidence to support the use of adjuvant capecitabine among patients with residual TNBC post-NAT, 39 an increase in the use of NAT and postoperative capecitabine is expected. 40,41 A remarkable 80% of patients with stage I-III TNBC in our study received RT.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 54 A meta-analysis also provided a rationale for adding capecitabine to either neoadjuvant or adjuvant standard chemotherapy in patients with TNBC. 55 Despite its substantial toxicity, additional capecitabine might be a reasonable option for patients with TNBC carrying a higher risk of relapse. Furthermore, in these patients, postneoadjuvant trials based on actionable molecular targets identified from residual tumour tissues should also be considered.…”
Section: Current Treatment Options In Early Tnbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These suggest improved outcomes in survival in breast cancer patients. All the patients with poor prognostic variables like triple negative, Er negative, HER2 positive tumors, those with axillary node positivity, high Ki67, vascular invasions, lymphatic invasions, perineural invasions and perinodal extensions showed better survival [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%