2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity withholding of GenCos in electricity markets using security-constrained generation maintenance scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of 28, 35, and 40 USD/ton are from [3][4][5], respectively. The values of 29,30,31,32,33,34,36,37,38, and 39 USD/ton are specifically chosen by the authors. It is expected that the models can still benefit GenCos when the emission cost coefficient is not constant.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of 28, 35, and 40 USD/ton are from [3][4][5], respectively. The values of 29,30,31,32,33,34,36,37,38, and 39 USD/ton are specifically chosen by the authors. It is expected that the models can still benefit GenCos when the emission cost coefficient is not constant.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GMS problem was proposed to maximize the profit and social welfare of GenCos and independent system operator (ISO), respectively, in oligopolistic markets. The withholding capacity based on the wealth transfer index and relative welfare loss index was adapted to solve the model [30]. Several GenCos use GMS to maximize their revenue, whereas an ISO runs the market with the minimum electricity price.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [10], electrical equipment's entire lifespan is well utilized effectively, until when failure occured used. As a result, the power supply to clients may be interrupted, and there is a risk of safety, health, and environmental (SHE) impacts due to random breakdowns.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trade-off should be properly balanced by the generation company [63]. Physical withholding and its implications are demonstrated in Figure 37 [70]. The right supply curve line represents the actual supply curve (corresponding to a truthful report of its generation capacity) of a strategic generation company 𝑖, while the left supply curve represents the supply curve reported in its bid; this is moved to the left as the company offers less than its actual capacity to the market.…”
Section: Bidding Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.8 Studying the VRE impact mitigation from both the electrical systems' side [18,35,68,69], i.e., enhancing the flexibility of existing power plants, and the markets' side, i.e., bidding strategies [36][37][38][39][70][71][72][73].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%