2011
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2107531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity Expansion in the Integrated Supply Network for an Electricity Market

Abstract: Constraints in fuel supply, electricity generation, and transmission interact to affect the welfare of strategic generators and price-sensitive consumers. We consider a mixed integer bilevel programming model in which the leader makes capacity expansion decisions in the fuel transportation, generation, and transmission infrastructure of the electricity supply network to maximize social welfare less investment cost. Based on the leader's expansion decisions, the multiple followers including the fuel suppliers, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 with the ISO's discrete transmission expansion decisions on the first level, multi-GENCOs' separate generation expansion decisions on the second level, and the multiple market players' operational decisions in the third level. By extending the bi-level model in [3], we decentralize the generation expansion decisions by separate GENCOs where, in the lower level, the GENCOs and ISO simultaneously optimize their own operational benefits. The GENCO decides its generation level, and the ISO allocates energy to the LSEs to maximize the total system surplus.…”
Section: B Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 with the ISO's discrete transmission expansion decisions on the first level, multi-GENCOs' separate generation expansion decisions on the second level, and the multiple market players' operational decisions in the third level. By extending the bi-level model in [3], we decentralize the generation expansion decisions by separate GENCOs where, in the lower level, the GENCOs and ISO simultaneously optimize their own operational benefits. The GENCO decides its generation level, and the ISO allocates energy to the LSEs to maximize the total system surplus.…”
Section: B Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling transmission planning in the top level is consistent with a principle that transmission planning should proactively influence generation investment [2]. The lower level interactions are based on our previous model [3], including strategic behavior by the GENCOs. Because the tri-level structure with a sub-problem of bi-level games poses solution difficulties, algorithms will first be proposed to solve the collection of bi-level games.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For each single MPEC, we can reformulate the lower level problem by introducing the binary variables µz and and a big value M, and converting all the equilibrium constraints of the form 0 x y 0 into 0 x, 0 y, x Mµz, y M 1 µz as in our previous paper [13]. Upon this reformulation, the MPEC becomes a single level programming problem with mixed integer linear constraints and nonlinear objective function given by equation (2) in Part I.…”
Section: Nash Equilibrium (Ne) Solution Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the progress towards deregulation and competition, the conventional GEP models in some studies have been replaced by decentralized ones. Several papers have compared the optimal investment in the centralized environment to that in the decentralized environment, and developed new models and algorithms by including game theory and uncertain factors [25][26][27][28]. However, even in a decentralized environment, a centralized planning process can provide targets.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in a decentralized environment, a centralized planning process can provide targets. Once these targets are identified, incentives and regulations can be designed to encourage decentralized decision makers to approach one of them [28]. Because the restructuring procedure has not taken hold in all regions of the US and large utilities still develop their own expansion plans, we maintain focus on this paper on a cost-minimization formulation that involves several uncertain factors.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%