2010 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/allerton.2010.5707065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity-distortion trade-off in channels with state

Abstract: A problem of state information transmission over a state-dependent discrete memoryless channel (DMC) with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) states, known strictly causally at the transmitter is investigated. It is shown that block-Markov encoding coupled with channel state estimation conditioned on treating the decoded message and received channel output as side information at the decoder yields the minimum state estimation error. This same channel can also be used to send additional independent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before proving the Theorem 1, we recall a lemma from [3] and summarize a few useful properties of C A SC (D) (similar to the [3, Corollary 1], [2]), which will be useful in proving the converse.…”
Section: Problem Setup and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Before proving the Theorem 1, we recall a lemma from [3] and summarize a few useful properties of C A SC (D) (similar to the [3, Corollary 1], [2]), which will be useful in proving the converse.…”
Section: Problem Setup and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacitydistortion tradeoff of such a channel is characterized for the case when the state information is available strictly causally at the channel encoder. The problem setting extends the action dependent framework of [1] and as a special case recovers the results of few previously considered joint communication and estimation scenarios in [2], [3], [4]. The scenario when the action is also allowed to depend on the past observed states (adaptive action) is also considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While [16] assumes that Agent 2 perfectly monitors the actions of Agent 1, we consider the case August 15, 2017 DRAFT of imperfect monitoring and analyze situations in which Agent 2 has a strictly causal knowledge (Theorem 4 and Corollary 12) or no knowledge (Theorem 5) of the state. • We clarify the connections between the game-theoretic formulation of [16] and information-theoretic considerations from the literature on state-dependent channels [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], separation theorems, and empirical coordination [5], [33]. We also formulate the determination of the long-run average payoff as an optimization problem, which we study in detail in Section IV and exploit for power control in Section V. • We establish a bridge between the coordination via actions and power control in wireless networks.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%