2016
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2016.2614320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity Characterization for State-Dependent Gaussian Channel With a Helper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1]. As observed in [11], the upper bound (91) is tight (i.e., C helper = C sum ) if P 1 ≤ 2.5, and the bound (92) is tight (i.e.,…”
Section: The Helper Problemmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…1]. As observed in [11], the upper bound (91) is tight (i.e., C helper = C sum ) if P 1 ≤ 2.5, and the bound (92) is tight (i.e.,…”
Section: The Helper Problemmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…and R 2 = 1 2 log (|K 2 + I|) are achievable. For the point-to-point helper channel [28], it was shown that if the helper power is above some threshold, the state is completely canceled, whereas in our model we have two parallel channels. If the helper power is high enough, it can split its signal, similarly as for the Gaussian BC, such that one part of it is intended for Receiver 2, where by using dirty paper coding it eliminates completely the interference caused by the state and the part of the signal intended for Receiver 1.…”
Section: Theorem 3 the Channel Parametersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The best outer bound for the Gaussian MAC setting was recently reported in [26]. The point-to-point helper channel studied in [27,28] can be considered as a special case of [25], where the cognitive transmitter does not send any message. Further in [28], the state-dependent MAC with an additional helper was studied, and the partial/full capacity region was characterized under various channel parameters.…”
Section: P Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations