2022
DOI: 10.3390/machines10010047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacitor Clamped Coupled Inductor Bi-Directional DC-DC Converter with Smooth Starting

Abstract: In this paper, a new type of capacitor clamped coupled inductor bidirectional DC–DC converter is proposed, which offers high voltage gain with smooth starting current transients, as well as reduced stresses on the capacitor. Steady state operation, mathematical modelling, and state space modelling for the proposed converter are presented in detail. A simplified single voltage clamped circuit is developed to mitigate the voltage spikes caused due to the coupled inductor by recovering the leakage energy effectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the use of a p Further, the graphical illustration of the comparative assessment between the proposed and existing converting technique is given in Figure 13. The proposed DEFC is compared with other existing inverters, such as the Differential Boost Inverter (DBI) [24], Quasi Z-Source Inverter (QZSI) [25,26], Buck-Boost Inverter (BBI) [27], Switched-coupled inductor inverter (SCII) [28], Improved Differential Boost Inverter (IDBI) [29], Split-Inductor Differential Boost Inverters Type-I (SIDBI-T1) [30], Split-Source Inverter (SSI) [31], Split-Inductor Differential Boost Inverters Type-II (SIDBI-T2) [30] Simplified High Gain Quasi-Boost Inverter (SHGqBI) [32], Bi-directional DC-DC Converter (BD DC-DC) [11], and Quasi-Z-Source Boost DC-DC Converter (QZS-DC-DC) [21]. From the illustration, it is observed that the proposed DEFC converter attains a higher efficiency rate (more than 97%) and found to be greater than other conventional inverters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of a p Further, the graphical illustration of the comparative assessment between the proposed and existing converting technique is given in Figure 13. The proposed DEFC is compared with other existing inverters, such as the Differential Boost Inverter (DBI) [24], Quasi Z-Source Inverter (QZSI) [25,26], Buck-Boost Inverter (BBI) [27], Switched-coupled inductor inverter (SCII) [28], Improved Differential Boost Inverter (IDBI) [29], Split-Inductor Differential Boost Inverters Type-I (SIDBI-T1) [30], Split-Source Inverter (SSI) [31], Split-Inductor Differential Boost Inverters Type-II (SIDBI-T2) [30] Simplified High Gain Quasi-Boost Inverter (SHGqBI) [32], Bi-directional DC-DC Converter (BD DC-DC) [11], and Quasi-Z-Source Boost DC-DC Converter (QZS-DC-DC) [21]. From the illustration, it is observed that the proposed DEFC converter attains a higher efficiency rate (more than 97%) and found to be greater than other conventional inverters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%