2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacitated lot sizing with linked lots for general product structures in job shops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See Oztürk and Ornek (2010) for the lot-sizing problem with setup carryover as well as with external demands for component items.…”
Section: Problem Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Oztürk and Ornek (2010) for the lot-sizing problem with setup carryover as well as with external demands for component items.…”
Section: Problem Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the length of the shortest path from node i to node j in the network constructed by Algorithm 1 is Hence, we generate arcs (0, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2,3) and (3,4) with production volumes 100 units, 60 units, 120 units, 60 units and 120 units respectively. In this network, period 1, 2, 3 and 4 are production points.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 a Network Algorithm To Deal With The (I+1 J)-pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lot sizing problems are categorized as single item problems [5]- [8] and multi-item problems [1]- [4] , or uncapacitated problems and capacitated problems. Reference [5] studied an uncapacitated single item lot sizing problem with dynamic demand and finite time horizon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few researchers have addressed capacitated lot sizing problems with back-ordering Daniel Quadt, Heinrich Kuhn [11], also the complexity of the modeling setup carry over in CLSP problems result in the not much attention in the literatures [18]. So in this paper we consider a lot sizing and scheduling in flow shop with sequence-dependent setups, setups carry over and backlogging.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence of items scheduled between the first and last does not affect the total required setup time unless the items are sequence dependent, where setups can be done in any order. The complexity of modeling setup carry over in CLSP problems is why it has not received much attention in the literature [18]. Diwakar Gupta and Thorkell Magnusson [1], have presented the single machine capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling problem (CLSP) with sequence-dependent setup costs and non-zero setup times, with the additional feature that setups may be carried over from one period to the next, and that setups are preserved over idle periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%