2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacitance changes associated with cation-transport in free-standing flexible Ti3C2Tx (T O, F, OH) MXene film electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3a and 5a). 14,[24][25][26][27]50,56,57 Moreover, peaks at 25.3 and 25.7 agree with XPS result ( Fig. 7a-d .…”
Section: X-ray Powder Diffraction (Xrd) Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…3a and 5a). 14,[24][25][26][27]50,56,57 Moreover, peaks at 25.3 and 25.7 agree with XPS result ( Fig. 7a-d .…”
Section: X-ray Powder Diffraction (Xrd) Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The O1s peaks at 529.5 eV were assigned to TiO (TiO 2 ), whereas 531.1, 532.2, and 533.7 eV were allotted to TiC(OH) x , Al 2 O 3, and H 2 O, respectively (Figure (e)). Moreover, the presence of TiO 2 confirmed that slight oxidation of the surface . Hence, MXene formed with the formula of Ti 3 C 2 (F,OH).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The 2θ peak at 7.14° (002) signified the characteristic peak of MXene, while at 14.36°, 19.12°, 28.98°, 38.86°, and 40.9° 2θ angles confirmed the presence of crystalline MXene . The disappearance peak of Ti 3 AlC 2 at 38.99° generated broad peaks of Ti 3 C 2 T x at 38.85° and 38.95° confirmed the eradication of Al and introduction of surface functionalities . In addition, the intense peaks at 9.5° of Ti 3 C 2 T x were considered as the corresponding MAX stack structure remains after the etching process (Figure (k)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The explanation of this phenomenon is complex due to many factors affecting the EC process. The capacitance of the electrode which depends on the electrolyte properties, i. e., its pH, type of cation and anion species, and salt concentrations, should be mainly taken into consideration . The electrolyte concentration has a significant influence on the mass transport of the analyte according to the Nerst‐Planck equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%