Capability impacts of the Covid-19 lockdown in association with mental well-being, social connections and existing vulnerabilities: an Austrian survey study
Abstract:BackgroundImpacts of the Covid-19 pandemic and its public health measures go beyond physical and mental health and incorporate wider well-being impacts in terms of what people are free to do or be. We explored these capability impacts of the Covid-19 lockdown in association with people’s mental well-being, social support and existing vulnerabilities in Austria.MethodsAdult Austrian residents (n=560) provided responses to a cross-sectional online survey about their experiences during Covid-19 lockdown (15 March… Show more
“…There was no observed significant association between previous medical history and mental well-being in our study. This is in contrast with the observations made in other studies elsewhere in the general population where individuals with history of chronic illness/pre-existing health conditions typically reported poorer mental health outcomes such as stress, anxiety and depression [17,60] and lower mental well-being [52]. Having pre-existing health conditions can predispose individuals to severe or deadly COVID-19 infections [60], and as such, could increase the anxiety around getting infected and perceived survival risk when infected, among individuals with pre-existing conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The average SWEMWBS scores for mental well-being of FIFO workers (24.8 ± 4.7) during the COVID-19 pandemic were higher than the population norms (23.6 ± 3.9) [51] and that reported in university teachers samples (21.5 ± 4.1) in Australia [49]. This finding is in discordant to the findings of studies suggesting higher levels of negative emotions, depression, anxiety and stress and poor mental health associated with COVID-19 related measures in the general population in Australia [9,15,23] and other countries [16,21,52]. Though the current results may suggest FIFO workers were able to cope with the disruption and stress of COVID-19 related measures, the differences observed could reflect the disparities in measurements, the periods at which studies were conducted and the samples as the current sample were mostly men who are generally less likely to experience internalized disorders including depression and anxiety, except for externalize disorders including aggression [53].…”
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has devastated the world, and its mental health impact has been recognized in the general population. However, little is known about the mental health impact of COVID-19 on fly-in fly-out (FIFO) workers, who are flown to temporarily stay and work in remote areas, during this pandemic. This study examined the mental well-being of FIFO workers in the mining industry during COVID-19 restrictions in Western Australia. An online survey was conducted between May to November 2020 among (N = 842) FIFO workers who underwent COVID-19 screening at a large mining company in Western Australia. The mental well-being score among workers was higher than population norms. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests showed significant differences in mental well-being by age, being placed under travel quarantine, undertaking self-isolation, impact of social distance guidelines, and experience of COVID-19 related symptoms. Multiple linear regression analysis showed workers who were younger, placed under travel quarantine and experienced two or more COVID-19 related symptoms were more likely to have worse mental well-being. Acknowledging the negative emotions and distress experiences among the vulnerable groups could help in providing suitable support to help lessen these negative experiences in FIFO workers.
“…There was no observed significant association between previous medical history and mental well-being in our study. This is in contrast with the observations made in other studies elsewhere in the general population where individuals with history of chronic illness/pre-existing health conditions typically reported poorer mental health outcomes such as stress, anxiety and depression [17,60] and lower mental well-being [52]. Having pre-existing health conditions can predispose individuals to severe or deadly COVID-19 infections [60], and as such, could increase the anxiety around getting infected and perceived survival risk when infected, among individuals with pre-existing conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The average SWEMWBS scores for mental well-being of FIFO workers (24.8 ± 4.7) during the COVID-19 pandemic were higher than the population norms (23.6 ± 3.9) [51] and that reported in university teachers samples (21.5 ± 4.1) in Australia [49]. This finding is in discordant to the findings of studies suggesting higher levels of negative emotions, depression, anxiety and stress and poor mental health associated with COVID-19 related measures in the general population in Australia [9,15,23] and other countries [16,21,52]. Though the current results may suggest FIFO workers were able to cope with the disruption and stress of COVID-19 related measures, the differences observed could reflect the disparities in measurements, the periods at which studies were conducted and the samples as the current sample were mostly men who are generally less likely to experience internalized disorders including depression and anxiety, except for externalize disorders including aggression [53].…”
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has devastated the world, and its mental health impact has been recognized in the general population. However, little is known about the mental health impact of COVID-19 on fly-in fly-out (FIFO) workers, who are flown to temporarily stay and work in remote areas, during this pandemic. This study examined the mental well-being of FIFO workers in the mining industry during COVID-19 restrictions in Western Australia. An online survey was conducted between May to November 2020 among (N = 842) FIFO workers who underwent COVID-19 screening at a large mining company in Western Australia. The mental well-being score among workers was higher than population norms. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests showed significant differences in mental well-being by age, being placed under travel quarantine, undertaking self-isolation, impact of social distance guidelines, and experience of COVID-19 related symptoms. Multiple linear regression analysis showed workers who were younger, placed under travel quarantine and experienced two or more COVID-19 related symptoms were more likely to have worse mental well-being. Acknowledging the negative emotions and distress experiences among the vulnerable groups could help in providing suitable support to help lessen these negative experiences in FIFO workers.
“…Long and indeterminate periods of lockdown imposed by governments to combat the pandemic could have contributed to a rise in adverse psychological symptoms (Brooks et al., 2020 ). According to research conducted worldwide, the most common psychological symptoms during the pandemic are increased levels of stress, anxiety, depression and poor quality of sleep (Ahmed et al., 2021 ; Bruno et al., 2020 ; Khademian et al., 2021 ; Lee et al., 2021 ; Rothe et al., 2021 ; Santabárbara et al., 2021 ; Silva et al., 2021 ; Simon et al., 2020 ; Sun et al., 2021 ; Varma et al., 2021 ; Wang et al., 2021 ). A study conducted in the United States in June 2020 with a sample of 9,896 people aged ≥18 years indicated a considerable increase in anxiety and depression, compared with the same period in 2019 (Czeisler et al., 2020 ).…”
Young people's mental health problems are a matter of concern during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Counselling services for university students by means of telemental support can help them to deal with psychological issues that they may be facing due to the pandemic. The present study investigated the effects of four once‐weekly online counselling sessions based on a mind‐body technique (the Brain Wave Modulation Technique; BWM‐T) on enhancing positive affect and on reducing negative affect and anxiety in a sample of 54 university students (96.3% females;
M
age
= 21.31 years,
SD
= 2.09). An experimental design was conducted: the participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group, which received 15 min of a guided online BWM‐T session, or to the control group, which watched a 15‐min video on how to sustain their psychological well‐being. The results of a two‐factor mixed‐design analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the participants in the intervention group reported a significant increase in positive affect and a decrease in negative affect over time compared to those in the control group. They also reported a slight decrease in state anxiety compared to the control group, although this was just short of statistical significance. The information provided by this study, regarding emotional outcomes among university students after four brief online counselling sessions, suggests that such interventions could be an effective and sustainable way to reinforce young people's mental health during the COVID‐19 pandemic, as well as later in their university careers and adult lives.
“…• Mental health and wellbeing COVID-19 has also had a significant influence on human behavior by raising anxiety/depression following the lockup and signaling longer-term mental health concerns (Serafini et al 2020;Santomauro et al 2021). Health emergencies may also affect individuals and communities through isolation, stigma, job insecurity, or inadequate resources for medical response (Simon et al 2020). Psy-Fig.…”
As of now, the COVID-19 pandemic has become uncontrolled and is spreading widely throughout the world. Additionally, new variants of the mutated viral variants have been found in some countries that are more dangerous than the original strain. Even vaccines cannot produce complete protective immunity against the newer strains of SARS-CoV-2. Due to such a dreadful situation, lots of fear and depression have been created among the public. People are looking for the treatment of the disease at any cost and there is a race in the market to provide treatment and make money, whether it is effective or not! In such a condition, many fraud products, remedies, and myths have come into the market, which is falsely claimed to be effective for the disease and can harm the patients. Hence, FDA has banned such products and remedies. In this review, we have compiled all such fraudulent and pseudosciences identified for COVID-19. Currently, in the pandemic time, health agencies are approving the repurposed medicines based on the small-scale clinical data for emergency uses that become ineffective (most of the cases) after large randomized clinical studies. Proper vigilance strategies need to be defined by the regulatory agencies of the nation and routine awareness programs shall be arranged for educating the people and healthcare workers on routine updates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.