2001
DOI: 10.1080/00220380412331322141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capability Failure and Group Disparities : Some Evidence from India for the 1980s

Abstract: This paper advances a particular measure of deprivation - called the Capability Failure Ratio (CFR) - on the dimensions of longevity, knowledge and income, and suggests how an (inequality-) 'adjusted' version of the CFR may be derived. These measurement concerns are explored in the context of relevant State-wise data for the Indian Union. The paper thus makes an attempt to enrich the analysis of human predicament by sensitising 'measures of central tendency' to distributional concerns.Capability Failure, Group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A particularly salient grouping of the population, in the Indian context, is that according to caste. The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes have been the worst victims of India's caste system, and this has been confirmed many times over by evidence on various development indicators for the Scheduled Castes and Tribes and the rest of the population (see, for example, Majumdar and Subramanian, 2001). Agedness indicators would appear to be no exception to the rule, as Table V confirms.…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 69%
“…A particularly salient grouping of the population, in the Indian context, is that according to caste. The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes have been the worst victims of India's caste system, and this has been confirmed many times over by evidence on various development indicators for the Scheduled Castes and Tribes and the rest of the population (see, for example, Majumdar and Subramanian, 2001). Agedness indicators would appear to be no exception to the rule, as Table V confirms.…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 69%
“…While relational inequalities are embedded in the social structure in the form of relations of 'superordination' and 'subordination', distributional inequalities allude to interpersonal differences in wealth or income or outcome indicators such as health and educational status (Chakraborty, 2001). Whichever space we deal with, income or important human capabilities, we find a host of studies that dwell on the issue of inequality across various population subgroups within the same geographical area (Anand and Sen, 1995;Subramanian and Majumdar, 2002;Jayaraj and Subramanian, 1999;Majumdar and Subramanian, 2001). Kakwani et al (1997) have discussed how health inequalities can be studied using grouped data, when groups are formed on the basis of socioeconomic status, social class, levels of educational attainment or income.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Inequality In Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly with the other attributes. This method of accommodating multiple individual identities has been employed by Majumdar and Subramanian (2001) in studying group-related disparities in the distribution of well-being in India.…”
Section: Partitioning the Population On The Basis Of Multiple Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%