Capability development in startup and mature enterprises

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to review the literature of enterprise capability, which comprises the three dimensions of operational, dynamic and improvisational capabilities, and analyze their differences. Through this review, the authors aim to enrich the enterprise capability theory and provide some directions for entrepreneurial practice in the face of volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA).Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on a systematic review of the literature on enterprise capability as it relates to entrepreneurial firms, following the content analysis approach as described in Gaur and Kumar (2018).FindingsThe authors’ conceptual model compares the capability levels of startups and mature enterprises and presents a model for the dynamic evolution of the capability levels of enterprises. In doing so, this study enriches the enterprise capability theory and lays the theoretical foundation for the follow-up empirical research. The authors also provide guidance for entrepreneurial practice in the face of VUCA.Originality/valueIn recent years, scholars have begun to explore the issue of enterprise capability in the field of entrepreneurship. However, because of different research perspectives, one lacks clarity on the concept and dimensions of enterprise capability. The capability theory is relatively weak in guiding the practice of enterprises; enterprises lack effective response strategies in a changing environment, and the failure rate of startups is high. This study aims to develop a deeper understanding of enterprise capability.

The effects of the COVID-19 crisis on startups' performance: the role of resilience

“…, 2020). Therefore, despite imposing new challenges on organisations, this new reality has presented various opportunities to develop alternative business models that fit this scenario (Davison, 2020; Ma et al. , 2020).…”

Independent Innovation Incentive Mechanism of the National Independent Innovation Demonstration Zone of China Based on Evolutionary Game

“…Dong et al analyzed the efficiency of three types of system incentives: rewards, punishments, and mixed rewards and punishments through group fitness [41]. Ma et al constructed a symbiotic evolution between the behaviors of architecture enterprises and recycling enterprises without government incentives [42]. Wang et al established an evolutionary game model for government and real estate enterprises.…”

Outcomes of Democratic Innovations: Horizontalism as Inclusive Participation Spillover, but Fragile under Hierarchical Attacks

“…Strongly based on personal motivations of the public servants and technical specialists, with little to no other endorsement than missionary driven determination, Madrid dialogical democracy was doomed to build its way inconsistently and with high personal costs, as it employed work overloads. As volatility and risks associated with capability development constitute the nemesis of start-up dynamics (Lundmark, Coad, Frankish,& Storey, 2020;Ma, Lang, Sun, & Singh, 2020), participatory mechanisms and institutions faced the same setbacks, being readily distorted after 2019 municipal elections. On the other hand, participation outcomes were strictly reduced through the national legal framework, which imposed authorization from the central government for local public consultations, limited their scope to municipal jurisdiction and prohibited any financial effects.…”