2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capability-based semantic interoperability of manufacturing resources: A BaSys 4.0 perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One widespread use of the term in robotics is skill learning where it is used to refer to the ability of the robot to achieve something via a behavior learned through observation, communication, experimentation or simulation. However, both terms are also often used as synonym of each other, for example by Perzylo and colleagues in their work on the description and orchestration of manufacturing skills (Perzylo, Grothoff, et al 2019).…”
Section: Environment Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One widespread use of the term in robotics is skill learning where it is used to refer to the ability of the robot to achieve something via a behavior learned through observation, communication, experimentation or simulation. However, both terms are also often used as synonym of each other, for example by Perzylo and colleagues in their work on the description and orchestration of manufacturing skills (Perzylo, Grothoff, et al 2019).…”
Section: Environment Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic mapping of a specific 4 https://github.com/OntoBREP manufacturing task to a compatible resource is achieved by combining device descriptions with a semantic description of their provided functionalities. In this context, we distinguish between the representation of the executable elements of such functionalities, i.e., skills [5], and the meta-level representation of their effects, i.e., capabilities [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the tedious task of manually modeling OWL ontologies for OPC UA base concepts and additional companion specifications, we developed a software tool for the automatic generation of these ontologies in OWL. Given an UA NodeSet2 description in the official XML dialect 6 , the corresponding XML Schema definition contained in UANodeSet.xsd, and the OPC UA core ontology, which has been described in the previous section, the transformation to OWL can be carried out automatically. The transformation tool uses XMLBeans 7 to parse the NodeSet2 description and to check it for conformity to its XML Schema.…”
Section: B Generation Of Ua Nodeset Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once process and product models are created, they can be reused in multiple workcells with different hardware. As long as provided manufacturing resources offer required capabilities, the associated tasks of a manufacturing process can be assigned to compatible resources [15]. In the assembly domain, this includes specifying assemblies with the help of geometric constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%