2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-047-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capabilities Using 2-D DIGE in Proteomics Research

Abstract: The use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis for differential analysis in proteomics was revolutionized by the introduction of 2-D fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE). This fluorescence-based technique allows the use of multiplexed samples and an internal standard that virtually eliminates gel-to-gel variability, resulting in increased confidence that differences found between samples are due to real induced changes, rather than inherent biological variation or experimental variability. 2-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By introduction of fluorescent cyanine dyes and an internal standard, the ability of 2-D DIGE to separate and resolve complex proteomic patterns was greatly improved (Van den Bergh and Arckens, 2004 ; Rozanas and Loyland, 2008 ). Although, 2-D DIGE has not totally overcome the shortfalls of gel-based proteomics technology, there is still not a method that can completely replace 2-D DIGE to simultaneously separate and display several thousand proteins from complex samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By introduction of fluorescent cyanine dyes and an internal standard, the ability of 2-D DIGE to separate and resolve complex proteomic patterns was greatly improved (Van den Bergh and Arckens, 2004 ; Rozanas and Loyland, 2008 ). Although, 2-D DIGE has not totally overcome the shortfalls of gel-based proteomics technology, there is still not a method that can completely replace 2-D DIGE to simultaneously separate and display several thousand proteins from complex samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%