2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2010.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capabilities of the bathymetric Hawk Eye LiDAR for coastal habitat mapping: A case study within a Basque estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of bathymetric lidar systems is greatly limited by turbidity, wave action, depth (up to 50-70 m in exceptionally good conditions), steep slopes, and rocky substrate Chust et al, 2010;Jalali et al, 2015). Current geomorphometric applications on bathymetric lidar data are mainly related to the exploration of coastal ecosystems (e.g.…”
Section: Bathymetric Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The efficiency of bathymetric lidar systems is greatly limited by turbidity, wave action, depth (up to 50-70 m in exceptionally good conditions), steep slopes, and rocky substrate Chust et al, 2010;Jalali et al, 2015). Current geomorphometric applications on bathymetric lidar data are mainly related to the exploration of coastal ecosystems (e.g.…”
Section: Bathymetric Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, the overlapping areas should yield very similar values, within their uncertainty and error ranges. However, important inconsistencies (up to 6.5 m) have been reported between depth measurements of the same areas using bathymetric lidar and MBESs (Quadros et al, 2008;Costa et al, 2009;Chust et al, 2010;Shih et al, 2014). This has implications for geomorphometry since terrain attributes will capture and classify these mismatches as features, especially as the differences usually occur locally (Chust et al, 2010).…”
Section: Broadscale Coastal Geomorphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Costa et al [3] found that in topographical charting, the LiDAR technique was comparable to the ship-based multibeam sonar technique, while the reflectance intensity parameter did not improve the results of habitat mapping in coral reef ecosystems. Chust et al [4] also found that reflectance was not particularly useful for classification purposes when analyzing data measured from the Oka estuary, Bay of Biscay, where waters are moderately turbid. They found that combined with multispectral (three visible bands plus NIR) data, the LiDAR-derived DEM gave good classification accuracy when used for discrimination between 22 supralittoral, intertidal and subtidal habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIDAR systems are fast, accurate and appropriate alternative solution for difficult shallow aquatic areas [10]. Some of these LIDAR systems can reach 70 m depths and 20 cm vertical accuracy [11]. Despite of the accuracy of these systems they are limited in coverage compared to satellite images and high costing of operation [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%