2013
DOI: 10.2179/13-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy Gap Dynamics in a Second-Growth Appalachian Hardwood Forest in West Virginia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In red spruce forests, average gaps sizes range from 53.4 m 2 to 66 m 2 in second and oldgrowth stands, respectively Rentch et al, 2010). For this region, our gap size is comparable to some research (Rentch et al, 2010) and smaller on average to others (Himes and Rentch, 2013). Our findings may be attributed to the high proportion of beech gap makers suffering from beech bark disease.…”
Section: Gap Size Distributionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In red spruce forests, average gaps sizes range from 53.4 m 2 to 66 m 2 in second and oldgrowth stands, respectively Rentch et al, 2010). For this region, our gap size is comparable to some research (Rentch et al, 2010) and smaller on average to others (Himes and Rentch, 2013). Our findings may be attributed to the high proportion of beech gap makers suffering from beech bark disease.…”
Section: Gap Size Distributionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Invasive understory plants, including R. multiflora , can exist in a lag phase until suitable conditions arise (Martin and Marks, 2006; Banasiak and Meiners, 2009). Gap closure can take as long as 9 years (Himes and Rentch, 2013), allowing sufficient time for seeds or clones of R. multiflora to establish or nearby plants to flourish. Based on our work, current management techniques should focus on removal of edge populations, which serve as potential sources of spread into younger forests with more open canopies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research in the central Appalachian region observed higher post-harvest abundance up to four years post-harvest in moderate to heavy harvests, although the response to lighter harvests decreased across time more rapidly (Boves et al, 2013b. The increase of sunlight into the open canopy for two growing seasons may have allowed the canopy trees in the lighter harvests to grow enough to reduce the number and size of gaps (Perkey et al, 2011;Himes and Rentch, 2013) such that the openings were no longer appropriate for Cerulean Warbler territories. The decline we observed three years post-harvest may have been driven by the small number of points sampled three years post-harvest, many of which were at our Kentucky (GL) study area.…”
Section: Response To Years-post-harvestmentioning
confidence: 95%