2016
DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.02015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy cover negatively affects arboreal ant species richness in a tropical open habitat

Abstract: We tested the hypothesis of a negative relationship between vegetation characteristics and ant species richness in a Brazilian open vegetation habitat, called candeial. We set up arboreal pitfalls to sample arboreal ants and measured the following environmental variables, which were used as surrogate of environmental heterogeneity: tree richness, tree density, tree height, circumference at the base of the plants, and canopy cover. Only canopy cover had a negative effect on the arboreal ant species richness. Ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As richness patterns are direct products of species' elevational ranges, the distribution of thermal preferences has a large impact; our results suggest a strong effect of the evolutionary temperature preferences of a taxon -here at temperatures in the lower third of the gradient -diffused through some combination of selection and drift as species have diverged, on current richness patterns. Ant richness tended to decline with increased habitat complexity, as measured by canopy cover, possibly due to less effective chemical trails, less efficient travel, or less available heat, a deterrent to opportunistic or generalist ants (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990, Lassau and Hochuli 2004, Queiroz and Ribas 2016. However, the opposite has also been documented, attributed to abundant nesting and foraging sites (Andersen 1986, Pacheco andVasconcelos 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As richness patterns are direct products of species' elevational ranges, the distribution of thermal preferences has a large impact; our results suggest a strong effect of the evolutionary temperature preferences of a taxon -here at temperatures in the lower third of the gradient -diffused through some combination of selection and drift as species have diverged, on current richness patterns. Ant richness tended to decline with increased habitat complexity, as measured by canopy cover, possibly due to less effective chemical trails, less efficient travel, or less available heat, a deterrent to opportunistic or generalist ants (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990, Lassau and Hochuli 2004, Queiroz and Ribas 2016. However, the opposite has also been documented, attributed to abundant nesting and foraging sites (Andersen 1986, Pacheco andVasconcelos 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat heterogeneity affects species diversity given any degree of specialization, but does not follow a consistent elevational pattern. The relevant habitat complexity axes depend on the focal taxon (Rosenzweig 1995, Stein et al 2014, and for ants, proposed variables include litter depth (Bharti et al 2013), undergrowth structure (Lassau andHochuli 2004, Pacheco andVasconcelos 2012), tree density (Queiroz and Ribas 2016), and canopy cover (Lassau and Hochuli 2004, Pacheco and Vasconcelos 2012, Queiroz and Ribas 2016. While area is partly consistent as a driver of ant elevational richness (Sanders 2002, Bishop et al 2014, Szewczyk and McCain 2016, even the direction of any effect of habitat complexity on ant richness is unclear, with decreases attributed to less efficient movement or chemical signaling (Lassau and Hochuli 2004), and increases to more varied niche space (Andersen 1986, Pacheco andVasconcelos 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other sites showed a more similar richness and composition, and probably have sufficient structural heterogeneity to allow a smaller niche overlap and therefore increase the number of ant species in these areas. According to Queiroz and Ribas (2016), the environmental heterogeneity is a determining factor for the coexistence of species and re-duction in competition. Other factors that can act for the determination of this pattern are the size of the fragments and the conservation status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ambientes perturbados, la diversidad de hormigas asociadas a la vegetación puede estar afectada por la disminución de la cobertura vegetal, las prácticas de manejo y el uso de fertilizantes y herbicidas (Roth et al, 1994;Perfecto y Snelling, 1995;Power, 1996;Perfecto et al, 1997). Por otro lado, algunos gremios o especies de hormigas omnívoras oportunistas pueden ser favorecidas por las perturbaciones antrópicas en los hábitats (Schreven, 2013;Queiroz y Ribas, 2016;Vanthomme et al, 2016). En este sentido las hormigas pueden jugar un papel importante como bioindicadores de la perturbación en el ecosistema, debido a su alta diversidad y abundancia, a la variedad de nichos que ocupan y a su rápida respuesta a cambios ambientales (Peck et al, 1998;Cuautle et al, 2016).…”
Section: Las Interacciones Planta-hormiga-herbívorounclassified