2005
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x(2005)034[1242:cagpai]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy- and Ground-Dwelling Predatory Arthropods in Commercial <I>Bt</I> and non-<I>Bt</I> Cotton Fields: Patterns and Mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
47
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our Þndings support those of other laboratory studies using other Bt proteins and are consistent with the lack of effects observed on populations of this predator in the Þeld (Head et al 2005, Torres and Ruberson 2005, Naranjo 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our Þndings support those of other laboratory studies using other Bt proteins and are consistent with the lack of effects observed on populations of this predator in the Þeld (Head et al 2005, Torres and Ruberson 2005, Naranjo 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nymphal nabids screened from Bt corn in the fi eld indicated that these natural enemies were among the three orders (Araneae, Coleoptera, and Heteroptera) found to contain Cry1Ab endotoxins above the threshold of 0.5 ng Cry1Ab per gram of fresh weight (Harwood et al 2005 ). However, in fi eld studies, the abundance of predators, including nabids, across 3 years in cotton fi elds with standard grower practices failed to exhibit any negative impact of Bt cotton on predator populations (Torres and Ruberson 2005 ). Nabids were among the arthropod faunae in orchard ground cover where plant species richness was a major driver for the fauna communities, both for the arthropod and pollinator assemblages (García and Miñarro 2013 ).…”
Section: Tritrophic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenic Bt cotton has provided an important tool for developing an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy [10,11], especially for lepidopterous larvae in cotton [12][13][14][15]. GM cotton expressing Cry genes is cultivated on 33.1 million ha in different cotton growing countries including United States [16,17], China [18][19][20], India [21][22][23][24][25][26], South Africa [27][28][29], Mexico [30], Argentina [31,32] and Pakistan [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and experienced many benefits like reduced use of broad-spectrum insecticides, improved control of target pests, reduced production cost, increased yield and better opportunity for biological control.…”
Section: Transgenic Bt Cottonmentioning
confidence: 99%