2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical Surface Mapping via Geometric Cycle Consistency

Abstract: Figure 1: We study the task of Canonical Surface Mapping (CSM). This task is a generalization of keypoint estimation and involves mapping pixels to canonical 3D models. We learn CSM prediction without requiring correspondence annotations, by instead using geometric cycle consistency as supervision. This allows us to train CSM prediction for diverse classes, including rigid and non-rigid objects. AbstractWe explore the task of Canonical Surface Mapping (CSM). Specifically, given an image, we learn to map pixels… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
135
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We report the average across ten randomly selected templates for each category. For a particular selected template, this baseline is an upper bound for CSM [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We report the average across ten randomly selected templates for each category. For a particular selected template, this baseline is an upper bound for CSM [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It generates impressive textured reconstructions from a single image, but still requires extra supervision in the form of corresponding keypoints during training, whereas we infer them. More recently, Canonical Surface Mapping (CSM) [5] predicts a UV mapping from a single image onto a canonical model, trained entirely using self-supervision, by introducing a geometric cycle-consistency term. For Kulkarni et al [10], the same mapping is applied but the canonical surface mesh can deform given an articulation parameter, which allows shape alignment to an input image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is no control over the pose and style of the generated object. Alongside, in 3D computer vision, there are several attempts to learn object reconstruction [26,32,34,33],…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%