1983
DOI: 10.1080/00207178308933084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical form observer design for non-linear time-variable systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
209
0
7

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 533 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
209
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature about this technique is vast. Since the pioneer works of (Bestle and Zeitz (1983); Krener and Isidori (1983)) for single output systems and (Krener and Respondek (1985); Xia and Gao (1989)) for the case of MIMO systems, many other results (see Keller (1987); Marino and Tomei (1996); Lynch and Bortoff (2001); Phelps (1991); Boutat et al (2009)) were published by following the same idea. However, the solvability of the problem requires the restrictive commutative Lie bracket condition for the deduced vector fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature about this technique is vast. Since the pioneer works of (Bestle and Zeitz (1983); Krener and Isidori (1983)) for single output systems and (Krener and Respondek (1985); Xia and Gao (1989)) for the case of MIMO systems, many other results (see Keller (1987); Marino and Tomei (1996); Lynch and Bortoff (2001); Phelps (1991); Boutat et al (2009)) were published by following the same idea. However, the solvability of the problem requires the restrictive commutative Lie bracket condition for the deduced vector fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is in some sense dual to the extended Luenberger observer [5,6]. The controller gain (5) is equivalent to the time-varying gain derived in [7].…”
Section: Exactly Linear Tracking Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key idea in such approaches is to produce approximate measures of nonlinearity of the order 1, as in Extended Luenberger Observers (ELOs) (Ciccarella et al, 1993). The approximation of nonlinearities in the canonical form (which results in an ELO) has already been suggested (Bestle and Zeitz, 1983), and this approach can be extended to higher order approximations (Röbenack and Lynch, 2004). An observer using a Partial nonlinear Observer Canonical Form (POCF) (Röbenack and Lynch, 2006) has weaker observability and integrability existence conditions than the well-established nonlinear Observer Canonical Form (OCF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%