“…A number of other investigators have employed perceptual psychology to shed light on the graphic strategies utilized in palaeoart, most notably Halverson (1992aHalverson ( , 1992b, Deręgowski (1989Deręgowski ( , 1995, and Hudson (1998). As neuroscience began to reveal the way the visual brain processes visual information, the findings were incorporated into existing theories of perceptual psychology to be subsequently applied to understanding palaeoart that Hodgson (2000;through to, 2013a; references within) explored in a series of papers from 2000 onwards, followed by, for example, Alpert (2009), Cheyne, Meschino, and Smilek (2009), Dobrez (2010-11, 2013a, Dobrez and Dobrez ( 2014), Hodgson and Helvenston (2006), Helvenston and Hodgson (2010), Petru (2008) and Watson (2009Watson ( , 2011Watson ( , 2012aWatson ( , 2012bWatson ( , 2013. Although playing down the role of neuroscience and the brain, Malafouris (2007) also made a significant contribution to the field by accentuating the role of embodied or enactive/grounded cognition by showing that the 'mind' is rooted in the material world, where image making not only serves to engage the immediacy of visual experience, but also sets up the ability to question and reformulate this immediacy.…”