2000
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannibals and parasites: conflicting regulators of bimodality in high latitude Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus

Abstract: Unexploited populations of Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) sampled in autonomous lake ecosystems in northern Svalbard demonstrate extraordinary catch curves with age and size frequency distributions characterized by discrete bimodality. Analyses of size‐age relationship, summer diet and food‐related intestinal parasite intensities of modal char groups revealed a pattern of discrete ontogenetic niche shifts. Life‐history changes at age 10–15 and size 200–300 mm/50–300 g involved shifting from an initial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
83
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(66 reference statements)
5
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Saanajärvi S. alpinus, however, the low C:N ratios of both muscle and liver tissue indicated that they contained only a little lipid (unpubl. data).According to the Z estimates, S. alpinus 130-200 mm in Saanajärvi had a more littoral trophic niche than the 200-350 mm fish and did not show a similar Hammar, 2000;Riget et al, 2000;, supporting the argument that in Saanajärvi, the S. alpinus of >200 mm L T have largely outgrown the predation window of cannibals. Such a seasonal shift of intermediate-sized S. alpinus to pelagic feeding during summer or autumn, while the smaller conspecifics remain in the benthic habitat throughout the year, seems to be a rather widespread phenomenon that is often assumed to be due to different predation risks and abilities of individuals of different sizes to exploit seasonally abundant pelagic food resources (Sparholt, 1985;L'Abée-Lund et al, 1993;Bjøru & Sandlund, 1995).…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Saanajärvi S. alpinus, however, the low C:N ratios of both muscle and liver tissue indicated that they contained only a little lipid (unpubl. data).According to the Z estimates, S. alpinus 130-200 mm in Saanajärvi had a more littoral trophic niche than the 200-350 mm fish and did not show a similar Hammar, 2000;Riget et al, 2000;, supporting the argument that in Saanajärvi, the S. alpinus of >200 mm L T have largely outgrown the predation window of cannibals. Such a seasonal shift of intermediate-sized S. alpinus to pelagic feeding during summer or autumn, while the smaller conspecifics remain in the benthic habitat throughout the year, seems to be a rather widespread phenomenon that is often assumed to be due to different predation risks and abilities of individuals of different sizes to exploit seasonally abundant pelagic food resources (Sparholt, 1985;L'Abée-Lund et al, 1993;Bjøru & Sandlund, 1995).…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…In allopatric S. alpinus populations, an obligatory shift to piscivory (i.e. cannibalism) occurs at a relatively large size compared with multispecies fish communities, where availability of other small-sized prey fish species enables a shift to piscivory by individuals of L T 100-200 mm and at the population level usually at L T of 200-300 mm (L' Abée-Lund et al, 1992;Hammar, 2000;. The rather late shift to piscivory in Saanajärvi is probably related to the prevailing size structure of the fish population, where any <100 mm fish may be quickly consumed by larger individuals (Polis, 1981;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in these lakes with cannibalistic populations, during special events, for example, when chironomid or trichopteran pupae hatch, all sizes of Arctic char as well as both terrestrial and marine birds may feed on the insects. During these and other periods of the summer season, presence of bird droppings and remains of marine crustaceans and marine fish in char stomachs indicate a marine source of energy to landlocked Arctic char in the High Arctic (Skreslet 1973;Hammar 2000). A special case is Jensenvatn in which both small and large individuals foraged almost exclusively on the abundant amphipod Gammaracanthus lacustris (Hammar 2000).…”
Section: Arctic Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within some landlocked populations, such as in Annavatn and Wibjørnvatn, char of different size show very different feeding behaviour; small fish that feed mainly on zooplankton and insects grow slowly, while fish of above a certain size turn cannibalistic, which leads to faster growth, larger size, and accumulation of parasites (Hammar 2000). However, in these lakes with cannibalistic populations, during special events, for example, when chironomid or trichopteran pupae hatch, all sizes of Arctic char as well as both terrestrial and marine birds may feed on the insects.…”
Section: Arctic Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finstad et al [76]. Another explanation for the differences in the two groups is a dimorphism with invertebrate eating dwarfs and cannibalistic giants [77], which could persist permanently [78]. Parker and Johnson [79], for example, have observed phenological differences between A. charr morphs such as different numbers of gill rakers.…”
Section: Ontogenetic Diet Shift In a Charrmentioning
confidence: 99%