1965
DOI: 10.1086/physzool.38.3.30152840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannibalistic Predation in Populations of Flour Beetles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
0
2

Year Published

1971
1971
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 or 16 males) may be higher than in the treatments of a female with fewer males (e.g. one or two males) (Park et al 1965). Higher cannibalism rates in the treatments with multiple males should not affect F 1 male and female fitness differently because there was no evidence that male and female eggs were cannibalized differentially by the adult beetles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…8 or 16 males) may be higher than in the treatments of a female with fewer males (e.g. one or two males) (Park et al 1965). Higher cannibalism rates in the treatments with multiple males should not affect F 1 male and female fitness differently because there was no evidence that male and female eggs were cannibalized differentially by the adult beetles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Self-regulation also could be accomplished by changes in survival rates-for example, by cannibalism (Park et al 1965, Mertz andRobertson 1970) or by dispersal. However, causes of deaths usually include extrinsic factors, such as predators, disease, or food scarcity.…”
Section: Population Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cannibals and victims are in different year classes or life stages (e.g., adults and larvae), dominant cohorts of cannibals can regulate recruitment (Gaines and Roughgarden 1985, Hastings and Constantino 1987, McCauley and Murdoch 1987, Van Buskirk 1992. Negative density dependence and recruitment regulation by cannibalism have been best studied in Tribolium beetles (Park et al 1965, Mertz 1972, Benoıˆt et al 1998) and predatory fishes (Donovan et al 1997, Juanes 2003, Post 2003, Andersson et al 2007). In both cases, whether cannibalism stabilizes or destabilizes populations depends on an interplay between the positive effects on cannibal growth and fecundity and negative effects on victim survival and growth (Hastings and Constantino 1991, Claessen and de Roos 2003, Persson et al 2004a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%