1995
DOI: 10.1537/ase.103.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannibalism in the Prehistoric American Southwest. Occurrence, Taphonomy, Explanation, and Suggestions for Standardized World Definition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other signs that cannibalism might have occurred included the fact that most of the bones recovered from the site were limb bones, possibly retained as a "portable food supply" (Beattie and Geiger, 1987:62), and the fact that many of the bones were found clustered outside a tent circle, as if intentionally deposited there (Beattie and Savelle, 1983). Turner and Turner (1995) identify five criteria that must be met before an interpretation of cannibalism can be made from human skeletal remains: cut marks, perimortem breakage, anvil or hammerstone abrasions, burning, and missing vertebrae. While these criteria were developed specifically for skeletal remains from the American Southwest, where cannibalism is believed to have occurred under circumstances other than famine (Turner and Turner, 1995), one and possibly two of these criteria, cut marks and perimortem breakage, are present in the skeletal remains from NgLj-2 and are consistent with the 19th-century Inuit accounts of cannibalism.…”
Section: Cannibalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other signs that cannibalism might have occurred included the fact that most of the bones recovered from the site were limb bones, possibly retained as a "portable food supply" (Beattie and Geiger, 1987:62), and the fact that many of the bones were found clustered outside a tent circle, as if intentionally deposited there (Beattie and Savelle, 1983). Turner and Turner (1995) identify five criteria that must be met before an interpretation of cannibalism can be made from human skeletal remains: cut marks, perimortem breakage, anvil or hammerstone abrasions, burning, and missing vertebrae. While these criteria were developed specifically for skeletal remains from the American Southwest, where cannibalism is believed to have occurred under circumstances other than famine (Turner and Turner, 1995), one and possibly two of these criteria, cut marks and perimortem breakage, are present in the skeletal remains from NgLj-2 and are consistent with the 19th-century Inuit accounts of cannibalism.…”
Section: Cannibalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turner and Turner (1995) identify five criteria that must be met before an interpretation of cannibalism can be made from human skeletal remains: cut marks, perimortem breakage, anvil or hammerstone abrasions, burning, and missing vertebrae. While these criteria were developed specifically for skeletal remains from the American Southwest, where cannibalism is believed to have occurred under circumstances other than famine (Turner and Turner, 1995), one and possibly two of these criteria, cut marks and perimortem breakage, are present in the skeletal remains from NgLj-2 and are consistent with the 19th-century Inuit accounts of cannibalism. Particularly revealing is the distribution of cut marks on the remains.…”
Section: Cannibalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was of key importance (Lowell, 1997;Walker, 2001). In doing so, the primary causes were interpreted as the result of, for example, cannibalism (for the criteria of cannibalism identification see Villa et al, 1986;White, 1992;Turner and Turner, 1995;Boulestin, 1999), ante-or perimortem scalping (Hamperl, 1967), warfare (Parker Pearson and Thorpe, 2005), decapitation, mortuary rituals, or postmortem traumas caused by scavengers or during site formation processes (taphonomy; Shipman, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible behavioral contexts of these modifications appear to be cannibalism (Villa et al, 1986;White, 1992;Turner and Turner, 1995;Boulestin, 1999), warfare (Rogers, 2004;Knü sel, 2005), and trophy-scalping (Milner et al, 1991;During and Nilsson, 1991;Murphy et al, 2002), as well as ritual modifications during secondary burial (Duday et al, 1990). The pattern of cutmarks on the CR3 cranium does not correspond to the patterns that have been identified for the first three behavioral contexts (particularly processing for nutritional content for cannibalism, embedded points, blunt fractures and parry fractures for warfare, and circular or midsagital cutmarks for scalping), making it likely that some form of funerary practice was responsible for the patterned cutmarks.…”
Section: Behavioral Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta interpretación deriva de los datos generados mediante el análisis tafonómico, involucrando los tipos de incisiones observadas, sus características en cuanto a localización sobre la topografía ósea, la diversidad de elementos afectados y las propiedades de los paquetes funerarios (i.e., composición y ordenación anatómica, pigmentación intencional y asociación contextual). Por otra parte, cabe mencionar que no se registró evidencia de fracturas en huesos "frescos", ni lascas óseas, así como tampoco rastros de alteración térmica que puedan indicar que las actividades sobre los cuerpos estuvieran vinculadas a otro tipo de hábitos culturales, como el canibalismo (Villa et al 1986;White 1992;Turner & Turner 1995). Además, los resultados del análisis llevado a cabo sobre esta muestra del registro bioarqueológico de PA1 no se condicen con las evidencias indicativas de violencia interpersonal (Larsen 1997).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified