Cannibalism and Nature

Davis, Michael N.

doi:10.3406/metis.1989.927

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…28 -Jowett in Barnes 1984: 2000: "All classes must be deemed to have their special attributes". 29 -A good example of intertextuality gone wrong: Since these words come from Tecmessa who quotes Ajax's blunt reply of an old saw to her when she tried to stop him going out to kill the Greek commanders, some have wanted this to show that Aristotle really means the opposite of what he actually says; so Davis 1989: 44 = 1996: 25-26, Nichols 19831992: 32-34;Saxonhouse 1982Saxonhouse : 208-9, 1985; see the criticisms of Mulgan 1994: 189, Simpson 1998 The Republic is still a possibility. So Aristotle resorts to a logical sleight of hand.…”

Section: The Teleological Movementioning

confidence: 99%

Aristotle’s Unanswered Questions: Women and Slaves in Politics 1252a-1260b

Parker

2012

Eugesta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aristotle is more straightforward than his interpreters. A number of scholars have championed an Aristotle guided by pure inductive observation to reach a theory of the inferiority of women and slaves. This view, however, is contrary both to Aristotle’s expressed method and his stated purpose. He begins from the phainomena and his explicit goal is to defend them and the advantages of master and husband. The current power structure is founded on nature and is and must be logically and genetically superior to the arguments he makes in its favor. In general, scholars have explicated either the argument about slaves or that about women. However, each is inescapably fettered to the other. The unquestioned inferiority of slaves is the analogical basis for the hierarchy of male over female (e.g. 1252a31). The unquestioned natural inferiority of women the basis of the proof of the existence of the natural slave (54b12-16). Aristotle reveals the uncertain heart of his argument in a series of unanswered rhetorical questions (59b23-37). There are three parts to his defense. The philosophical move is to reject Plato’s unity of virtue. Mere difference in quantity (Plato’s solution) provides contingent not absolute rule. The teleological move argues from different virtues to different essences for women and slaves. Aristotle creates separate entities to be ruled. The rhetorical move is to blend analogies based on the “natural” difference between male and female with the hierarchical difference between master and slave. Thus we reach the master trope of Western philosophy: man is spirit/culture, woman is matter/nature. A series of misreadings of Aristotle’s purposes and arguments reveal how successful he has been in anchoring ideology in a politicized nature. Philosophy is not a purely intellectual exercise; it is also a call to moral action. We must ask and answer Aristotle’s rhetorical questions.

show abstract

Section: The Teleological Movementioning

confidence: 99%

Aristotle’s Unanswered Questions: Women and Slaves in Politics 1252a-1260b

Parker

2012

Eugesta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cannibalism and Nature

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Aristotle’s Unanswered Questions: Women and Slaves in Politics 1252a-1260b

Aristotle’s Unanswered Questions: Women and Slaves in Politics 1252a-1260b

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About