2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabis with high Δ9-THC contents affects perception and visual selective attention acutely: An event-related potential study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
9
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This profile of effects is consistent with the published data using two-stimuli P300 paradigms (Bocker et al, 2010;Ilan et al, 2004;Roser et al, 2008). Amplitude of the P300b is thought to reflect attentional resource allocation, phasic attentional shifts, working memory updating of stimulus context, cognitive closure, and stimulus salience (Donchin and Coles, 1988;Knight and Scabini, 1998;Kramer and Strayer, 1988;Polich, 1989;Verleger et al, 2005).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…This profile of effects is consistent with the published data using two-stimuli P300 paradigms (Bocker et al, 2010;Ilan et al, 2004;Roser et al, 2008). Amplitude of the P300b is thought to reflect attentional resource allocation, phasic attentional shifts, working memory updating of stimulus context, cognitive closure, and stimulus salience (Donchin and Coles, 1988;Knight and Scabini, 1998;Kramer and Strayer, 1988;Polich, 1989;Verleger et al, 2005).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although smoking cannabis or D 9 -THC diminished the response of pupillary constriction to a flash of light (phasic response), they are not able to exert a clear direct effect of modification of the diameter of the pupil, indicating that D 9 -THC has no effect on the mechanisms involved in the regulation of tonic pupil size (Waldorf et al (1995)). Besides the effects on adjustment of the pupillary diameter it has been reported that D 9 -THC affected visual selective attention (Bocker et al, 2010) and reduced binocular depth inversion (Leweke et al, 1999;Semple et al, 2003) in humans. Although it was not identified a specific anatomical substrate responsible for the cannabinoid-induced visual impairment in rodents, some studies have shown that CB 1 receptors are critically involved in the modulation of visual cortical plasticity in mice (Liu et al, 2008;Garkun and Maffei, 2014) and that D 9 -THC inhibits the visual processes in rat by impairing the thalamocortical transmission (Dasilva et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several neuropsychological studies found that cognitive function reverts to normal with prolonged cannabis abstinence [51,65]. Reduced P300 amplitudes during experimental cannabis intoxication in different task settings including the novelty-oddball task [43] were previously reported [38][39][40][41][42]. However, only few studies have investigated P300 amplitudes in chronic cannabis users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas widely varying results have been obtained after long-term abstinence across different studies [14,[35][36][37], the oddball P300 amplitude is clearly reduced during acute cannabis intoxication [38][39][40][41][42]. Furthermore, a recent study by D'Souza et al [43] demonstrated both reduced novelty P300 and oddball P300 amplitudes by intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in healthy subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%