Cannabis use and cannabis use disorders and their relationship to mental disorders: A 10-year prospective-longitudinal community study in adolescents

Wittchen, Hans‐Ulrich; Fröhlich, Christine; Behrendt, Silke; Günther, Agnes; Rehm, Jürgen; Zimmermann, Petra; Lieb, Roselind; Perkonigg, Axel

doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.12.013

Cited by 270 publications

(216 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

197

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, specific manifest outcomes in Fig. 1 may be linked to more than one psychopathology spectrum ; for example, marijuana use and problems may show additional connections with the internalizing spectrum (Wittchen et al 2007) and different elements of impulsivity may be associated with specific risky behaviors (Smith et al 2007).…”

Section: Co-morbidity Patterns For Dsm Disordersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

"Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11." Psychological Medicine.39,12. 2061-2070. http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/3931Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11Paper 6 of 7 of the thematic section : ' A proposal for a meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11 ' R. F. Krueger 1 * and S. C. South 2 1 Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA 2 Department of Psychology, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, USA Background. The extant major psychiatric classifications DSM-IV and ICD-10 are purportedly atheoretical and largely descriptive. Although this achieves good reliability, the validity of a medical diagnosis is greatly enhanced by an understanding of the etiology. In an attempt to group mental disorders on the basis of etiology, five clusters have been proposed. We consider the validity of the fifth cluster, externalizing disorders, within this proposal.Method. We reviewed the literature in relation to 11 validating criteria proposed by the Study Group of the DSM-V Task Force, in terms of the extent to which these criteria support the idea of a coherent externalizing spectrum of disorders.Results. This cluster distinguishes itself by the central role of disinhibitory personality in mental disorders spread throughout sections of the current classifications, including substance dependence, antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder. Shared biomarkers, co-morbidity and course offer additional evidence for a valid cluster of externalizing disorders.Conclusion. Externalizing disorders meet many of the salient criteria proposed by the Study Group of the DSM-V Task Force to suggest a classification cluster.

show abstract

Section: Co-morbidity Patterns For Dsm Disordersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We considered several individual, peer and family factors. When searching for relevant literature on illicit drugs we focused on cannabis, as in Finland, like in many developed countries, cannabis products (marijuana, hashish) are the most commonly used ones (Programme on Substance Abuse, 1997; Virtanen and Sjöberg, 2006 (Guxens et al, 2007a(Guxens et al, , 2007bKandel and Yamaguchi, 1993), especially age of onset (Gilvarry, 2000;Vega and Gil, 2005), alcohol consumption (Guxens et al, 2007a(Guxens et al, , 2007b, especially drinking to intoxication Wittchen et al, 2007). Own ever smoking was asked prospectively at the age 14 survey.…”

Section: Predictors-mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among individual factors, use of licit substances Gilvarry, 2000;Guxens et al, 2007aGuxens et al, , 2007bKandel and Yamaguchi, 1993;Vega and Gil, 2005;Wittchen et al, 2007) has been reported consistently as a risk factor for subsequent use of illicit drugs. Characteristics related broadly to externalizing behaviors, such as impulsivity (Conway et al, 2003), early behavior problems (Kreek et al, 2005), as well as behavioral and emotional symptoms (Brook et al, 1996;Buckner et al, 2008;Jane-Llopis and Matytsina, 2006;Monshouwer et al, 2006;White et al, 2001;Wittchen et al, 2007) have been identified as risk factors for drug use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Characteristics related broadly to externalizing behaviors, such as impulsivity (Conway et al, 2003), early behavior problems (Kreek et al, 2005), as well as behavioral and emotional symptoms (Brook et al, 1996;Buckner et al, 2008;Jane-Llopis and Matytsina, 2006;Monshouwer et al, 2006;White et al, 2001;Wittchen et al, 2007) have been identified as risk factors for drug use. Further, influences of peers (Agrawal et al, 2007;Guxens et al, 2007aGuxens et al, , 2007b and parents (Chen et al, 2005;Hayatbakhsh et al, 2007), as well as unfavorable socio-economic circumstances (Compton et al, 2005) have been documented as determinants for cannabis use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Role of individual, peer and family factors in the use of cannabis and other illicit drugs: A longitudinal analysis among Finnish adolescent twins

Korhonen

Huizink²,

Dick

et al. 2008

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Use of other drugs has been related to both mental health problems and cannabis use or dependence, and attenuates these associations [5,7,[23][24][25][26]. This is also true for childhood adversities [27,28].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Mental health differences between frequent cannabis users with and without dependence and the general population

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mental health differences between frequent cannabis users with and without dependence and the general population van der Pol, P.; Liebregts, N.; de Graaf, R.; ten Have, M.; Korf, D.J.; van den Brink, W.; van Laar, M. Published in: Addiction DOI:10.1111/add.12196 Link to publicationCitation for published version (APA): van der Pol, P., Liebregts, N., de Graaf, R., ten Have, M., Korf, D. J., van den Brink, W., & van Laar, M. (2013). Mental health differences between frequent cannabis users with and without dependence and the general population. Addiction, 108(8), 1459-1469. DOI: 10.1111/add.12196 General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. ABSTRACTAims To compare the prevalence of mental disorders between frequent cannabis users with and without dependence and the general population. Design Cross-sectional comparison of interview data. Setting Enriched community sample of frequent cannabis users and a representative sample of non-users and non-frequent users from the general population. Participants A total of 521 young adult (aged 18-30 years) frequent cannabis users, 252 of whom were with DSM-IV cannabis dependence (D+) and 269 without DSM-IV cannabis dependence (D-), and 1072 young adults from the general population. Measurements Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare groups regarding the presence of DSM-IV mental disorders. Detailed measures of cannabis use, childhood adversity and other substance use were considered confounders. Findings Compared with the general population, externalizing disorders were more prevalent in D-[odds ratio (OR) = 8.91, P < 0.001] and most prevalent in D+ (OR = 17.75, P < 0.001), but internalizing disorders were associated only with D+ (mood OR = 4.15, P < 0.001; anxiety OR = 2.20, P = 0.002). Associations were attenuated (and often became non-significant) after correction for childhood adversity and substance use other than cannabis. However, the prevalence of mental disorders remained higher in D+ compared with D-(OR = 2.40, P < 0.001), although cannabis use patterns were remarkably similar. Conclusions Cannabis use patterns, childhood adversity and the use of other substances are similar in dependent and non-dependent frequent cannabis users. With the exception of more externalizing disorders, the mental health ...

show abstract

Cannabis use and cannabis use disorders and their relationship to mental disorders: A 10-year prospective-longitudinal community study in adolescents

Cited by 270 publications

References 39 publications

Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11

Externalizing disorders: Cluster 5 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11

Role of individual, peer and family factors in the use of cannabis and other illicit drugs: A longitudinal analysis among Finnish adolescent twins

Mental health differences between frequent cannabis users with and without dependence and the general population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About