2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabis problem experiences among users of the tobacco–cannabis combination known as blunts

Abstract: Background In most of the world, cannabis smokers mix loose tobacco inside a joint, pipe, spliff, or cone. More recently, a ‘blunt’ formulation combines these two drugs by inserting cannabis into a hollowed-out cigar. Epidemiological research linking simultaneous use of these two drugs and the development of cannabis use disorders (CUD) remains unclear. This study estimates associations linking blunt smoking with levels and subtypes of cannabis problems. Methods Cross-sectional data on 27,767 past-year canna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although studies have acknowledged that blunt use is associated with an increased risk of marijuana-related problems (Fairman, 2015), this study adds to the literature by showing that among Blacks, the increased risk of marijuana abuse or dependence is largely found among females. It is also important to note that among past-month marijuana smokers, females reported using blunts at a slightly higher rate than males (17 vs. 14 days).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although studies have acknowledged that blunt use is associated with an increased risk of marijuana-related problems (Fairman, 2015), this study adds to the literature by showing that among Blacks, the increased risk of marijuana abuse or dependence is largely found among females. It is also important to note that among past-month marijuana smokers, females reported using blunts at a slightly higher rate than males (17 vs. 14 days).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The adult literature also demonstrates an association between being Black and co-use, with couse increasing significantly in this population over the past decade (Schauer et al, 2015). Blacks may prefer blunts to joints because blunts can hold more marijuana, they burn more slowly, they are easier to transport and conceal, they help culturally distinguish young marijuana users from the older generation of marijuana users, and Blacks are more likely than other racial groups to have friends who smoke blunts (Fairman, 2015;Mariani et al, 2011;Ream et al, 2006;Sifaneck et al, 2006;Sinclair et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Montgomery (2015) found that blunt use among blacks was related to a pattern of an earlier age of onset of cigarette, cigar and cannabis use than no use of blunt (tobacco use only). Recent studies showed that blunt use was associated with increased odds of cannabis use disorder among blacks (Cohn et al, 2016; Fairman, 2015). Lastly, blacks have faced more barriers to mental health care than white, and a delay to access timely healthcare may be related to excess use of ED care (Cook et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black, Multiracial, and LGB youth were significantly more likely report "other" as their usual mode of consumption, as were those reporting early marijuana use (i.e., use before age 13), frequent marijuana use (i.e., used >20 times in the past 30 days), and cigarette smoking. Because blunt use (i.e., smoking marijuana using a hollowed-out cigar) is more common among Blacks, those who report cigarette smoking, and those with a cannabis use disorder (Fairman, 2015;Golub, 2006;Soldz et al, 2003), some youth reporting "other" as their usual mode of consumption may have been referring to blunt use (i.e., they may consider blunt use as distinct from smoking marijuana). Future studies could provide clarity about other modes of use by inviting participants to specify the modes they are referring to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%