Abstract:The effect of cannabinoids on liver transplant outcomes is an area of active research. We aimed to investigate marijuana (MJ) and cannabidiol (CBD) use among liver transplant recipients at the University of Colorado Hospital (UCH), specifically prevalence, habits, and predictors of use. Liver transplant recipients followed at UCH with valid email addresses were sent an informed consent postcard and survey invitation. This exploratory survey was conducted using REDCap. IBM SPSS Statistics software was used for … Show more
“…A survey study showed that self-reported physical health ratings were not significantly different among post-transplantation marijuana users, former marijuana users, and non-users (3). Self-reported mental health ratings were worse among post-transplantation marijuana users as compared to former users and non-users, although it is not known if this was directly due to marijuana use or if self-perceived worse mental health resulted in marijuana use (3). We note, however, that the designs of the above studies are subject to selection and reporting biases (3,28).…”
Section: Impact Of Pre-transplantation and Posttransplantation Mariju...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Self-reported mental health ratings were worse among post-transplantation marijuana users as compared to former users and non-users, although it is not known if this was directly due to marijuana use or if self-perceived worse mental health resulted in marijuana use (3). We note, however, that the designs of the above studies are subject to selection and reporting biases (3,28). Also, important factors like the route of marijuana administration, the quantity of marijuana use, and toxicology screens were not determined and included in the analysis (28).…”
Section: Impact Of Pre-transplantation and Posttransplantation Mariju...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, 17% of the Canadian population used cannabis, with the majority using it once a day (1). Cannabis is also reported to be commonly used by liver transplant candidates for numerous reasons including anxiety, pain, nausea, insomnia, and recreation (3).…”
Background: Recreational cannabis was legalized in Canada in 2018. A controversial contraindication for liver transplantation is cannabis. There is currently no consensus regarding cannabis use in liver transplant candidates. We aim to investigate liver transplantation candidacy and outcomes among cannabis users. Methods: English peer-reviewed studies on PubMed and Google Scholar were searched on September 9, 2022, using keywords including “cannabis”, “liver transplantation”, and their synonyms. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full texts. Reference lists were reviewed. Studies that investigated liver transplantation candidacy and outcomes among cannabis users were included. Results: The proportion of patients listed for liver transplantation was significantly less among marijuana users than among non-users. Time to listing was longer for marijuana users than non-users. The incidence of delisting was similar. There is an inconsistency between transplant centers regarding transplantation candidacy for marijuana users. While only 14% of Canadian centers had a policy in place and preferred candidates to abstain or decrease marijuana use before transplantation, a third of Canadian centers rejected marijuana users. Observational studies failed to demonstrate significant differences in patient survival between pre-transplantation marijuana users and non-users. However, self-reported mental health ratings were worse in post-transplantation marijuana users than in non-users and former users. Conclusions: Current observational data do not support a link between marijuana use and poor patient survival post-transplantation. However, high-quality prospective studies are needed to better elucidate the impact of marijuana use on liver transplantation outcomes. Liver transplant candidacy should be evaluated through a multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach considering all relevant psychosocial factors.
“…A survey study showed that self-reported physical health ratings were not significantly different among post-transplantation marijuana users, former marijuana users, and non-users (3). Self-reported mental health ratings were worse among post-transplantation marijuana users as compared to former users and non-users, although it is not known if this was directly due to marijuana use or if self-perceived worse mental health resulted in marijuana use (3). We note, however, that the designs of the above studies are subject to selection and reporting biases (3,28).…”
Section: Impact Of Pre-transplantation and Posttransplantation Mariju...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Self-reported mental health ratings were worse among post-transplantation marijuana users as compared to former users and non-users, although it is not known if this was directly due to marijuana use or if self-perceived worse mental health resulted in marijuana use (3). We note, however, that the designs of the above studies are subject to selection and reporting biases (3,28). Also, important factors like the route of marijuana administration, the quantity of marijuana use, and toxicology screens were not determined and included in the analysis (28).…”
Section: Impact Of Pre-transplantation and Posttransplantation Mariju...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, 17% of the Canadian population used cannabis, with the majority using it once a day (1). Cannabis is also reported to be commonly used by liver transplant candidates for numerous reasons including anxiety, pain, nausea, insomnia, and recreation (3).…”
Background: Recreational cannabis was legalized in Canada in 2018. A controversial contraindication for liver transplantation is cannabis. There is currently no consensus regarding cannabis use in liver transplant candidates. We aim to investigate liver transplantation candidacy and outcomes among cannabis users. Methods: English peer-reviewed studies on PubMed and Google Scholar were searched on September 9, 2022, using keywords including “cannabis”, “liver transplantation”, and their synonyms. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full texts. Reference lists were reviewed. Studies that investigated liver transplantation candidacy and outcomes among cannabis users were included. Results: The proportion of patients listed for liver transplantation was significantly less among marijuana users than among non-users. Time to listing was longer for marijuana users than non-users. The incidence of delisting was similar. There is an inconsistency between transplant centers regarding transplantation candidacy for marijuana users. While only 14% of Canadian centers had a policy in place and preferred candidates to abstain or decrease marijuana use before transplantation, a third of Canadian centers rejected marijuana users. Observational studies failed to demonstrate significant differences in patient survival between pre-transplantation marijuana users and non-users. However, self-reported mental health ratings were worse in post-transplantation marijuana users than in non-users and former users. Conclusions: Current observational data do not support a link between marijuana use and poor patient survival post-transplantation. However, high-quality prospective studies are needed to better elucidate the impact of marijuana use on liver transplantation outcomes. Liver transplant candidacy should be evaluated through a multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach considering all relevant psychosocial factors.
“…Cannabinoids are among the most controversial topics that SOT clinicians encounter [22] as their use continues to rapidly gain widespread legal and societal acceptance. Use is similarly increasing among liver transplantation patients with 12-month cannabis use rates in candidates at 11.0% and recipient rates of active cannabis use of 23.8% and rates of active cannabidiol use of 21.0% [23,24 ▪ ]. Cannabinoid data in SOT exist primarily in liver and kidney populations and less is known about their effects in heart and lung candidates and recipients.…”
Purpose of reviewThe current article examines recent publications regarding ongoing clinical and ethical challenges and opportunities related to substance use disorders (SUD) in solid organ transplantation (SOT) utilizing a lens of interprofessional clinical models and care delivery.Recent findingsInnovative interprofessional clinician skillsets and care models are increasingly emphasized in the SOT literature as the standard of care for common, complex psychosocial problems like substance use and SUD. Cannabinoids are common among candidates and recipients and present several unique quandaries to SOT teams. Opioid use disorder treatment can often be definitively treated with medications that SOT teams may find unfamiliar, controversial, or aversive. Arguably the quintessential example of SUD in SOT, early liver transplantation for patients with alcohol-related liver disease and short periods of sobriety has become increasingly common and accepted in recent years requiring liver teams to rapidly acquire significant interprofessional psychiatric awareness and expertise. The question of retransplantation in patients who have experienced recurrent SUD remains unsettled.SummaryRegardless of substances used or organs transplanted, interprofessional care continues to emerge as a foundational aspect of clinical care and research in SOT.
“…[1,2] Cannabinoids Social, legal, and medical landscapes of cannabinoid use are rapidly evolving in the United States, and LT policies are similarly heterogenous. [8] Cannabinoid use is increasing in LT patients, [18,19] and there is no expert consensus regarding cannabinoid use in LT despite the numerous medical and psychosocial considerations of which clinicians must be aware including possible drug interactions with immunosuppressants. [20] A minority of LT programs allow active marijuana use in their candidates.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.