2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11419-015-0269-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled vaporizer administration with and without alcohol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
34
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…. Cannabis significantly slowed alcohol absorption (Hartman et al , ); after placebo cannabis, the median and maximum BrAC decreased throughout the drive as expected whereas after the high cannabis dose the BrAC range remained consistent throughout driving with a slightly increasing median. The low cannabis dose displayed a BrAC pattern with placebo and high‐dose characteristics, reflecting a midpoint between conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. Cannabis significantly slowed alcohol absorption (Hartman et al , ); after placebo cannabis, the median and maximum BrAC decreased throughout the drive as expected whereas after the high cannabis dose the BrAC range remained consistent throughout driving with a slightly increasing median. The low cannabis dose displayed a BrAC pattern with placebo and high‐dose characteristics, reflecting a midpoint between conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…We also did not observe an interaction lessening the SD speed increase associated with alcohol. Although the alcohol area under the curve did not significantly differ from cannabis (Hartman et al , ), cannabis resulted in slower alcohol absorption and more consistent estimated BrAC throughout a ~0.75‐h drive beginning 0.5 h after alcohol administration ended. Individuals who consume concurrent cannabis and alcohol may experience more elevated or rising alcohol concentrations longer than with alcohol alone, thereby increasing the driving risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Full blood and OF pharmacokinetic data are presented in Hartman et al (2015b and 2015a, respectively). Between-subject blood concentration variability (coefficient of variation) was substantially lower than matched OF concentration variability at all time points: 45–65% vs. 125–207%, respectively, immediately post-dose; 39–69% vs. 129–184% at 1.4h; and 61–82% vs. 139–174% at 2.3h (Table 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-assay (n=30) analytical bias and imprecision were ≤3.7% and ≤8.7%, respectively. OF THC quantification is described in detail elsewhere (Hartman et al, 2015a). We utilized a published validated method (Milman et al, 2010), modified by adding 0.4mL hexane to solid-phase extraction columns before the initial elution solvent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breath detection windows are currently limited to approximately 2 h postsmoking (39 ), whereas impairing effects may extend beyond this period. Oral fluid is a promising noninvasive matrix, with roadside screening applicability and detection windows comparable to acute impairment windows if recent use markers are included (40 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%