1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb02910.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine tooth strength and killing behaviour in large carnivores

Abstract: Bending strength of upper canine teeth is examined among living canids, felids, hyaenids and several extinct species including sabretooth cats, borophagine dogs and the dire wolf, Canis dirus. The tooth is modelled as a cantilever with an elliptical cross‐section. Using beam theory, the bending strength of the upper canine is calculated given a constant force applied to the canine tip. Results indicate that felids and hyaenids have relatively stronger canines than canids, particularly in bending about the ante… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
263
1
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
263
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Claws built for puncturing wood would benefit from a very narrow tip (Cartmill, 1985), whereas burrowers may benefit from a wide claw as it would help transport soil (Hildebrand, 1985). Excluding the third dimension also prohibits investigating certain biomechanical principles by assessing lateral bending strengths (performed for teeth by Valkenburgh and Ruff (1987)), or conducting finite element modelling (Lautenschlager, 2014; Manning et al., 2009). Future studies should consider in what way medial‐lateral claw characters may influence claw function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Claws built for puncturing wood would benefit from a very narrow tip (Cartmill, 1985), whereas burrowers may benefit from a wide claw as it would help transport soil (Hildebrand, 1985). Excluding the third dimension also prohibits investigating certain biomechanical principles by assessing lateral bending strengths (performed for teeth by Valkenburgh and Ruff (1987)), or conducting finite element modelling (Lautenschlager, 2014; Manning et al., 2009). Future studies should consider in what way medial‐lateral claw characters may influence claw function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biknevicus et al (1996) modeled carnivore incisors as a cantilever beam and determined that incisor bending strength is largely a function of cross-sectional geometry. Any increase in the maximum LL and MD dimensions of the incisor crown results in a proportionate increase in bending strength (van Valkenburgh and Ruff, 1987;Plavcan and Ruff, 2008). Given that an increase in anthropoid MD and CI crown curvature would effectively increase labiolingual crown dimensions, it stands to reason that incisors with increased crown curvature will be more resistant to bending stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 illustrates the linear dimensions used in the present study. Van Valkenburgh and Ruff (1987) have previously demonstrated that teeth with relatively simple crown morphology (i.e. unicuspid incisors and canines) can be modeled as a cantilevered beam that is rigidly fixed at one end to the bone of the maxilla or mandible, although such a model does not consider more nuanced aspects of incisor morphology (i.e.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If equal forces were generated in both unilateral and bilateral canine biting, the canine teeth involved in unilateral biting would experience much higher concentrations of stress. In contrast to the canines of carnivorans, the canine teeth of bats are relatively long, thin and exhibit sharp crests along their length (Freeman, 1992 ability of these teeth to initiate and propagate cracks in food items (Freeman, 1992), it is not well suited to resist breaking under high loads (Van Valkenburgh and Ruff, 1987). Given the shape of bat canine teeth and the concentration of forces on fewer teeth during unilateral biting, we suggest that sensory feedback from the canine alveoli may serve as a signal to decrease bite force during unilateral canine biting and thus protect these teeth from high stresses and potential damage.…”
Section: Table·2 Gape Angles For Canine and Molar Bites And Absolutementioning
confidence: 99%