1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90010-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine slope and glenoid cavity morphology: Relationships with dental wear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, from the results of the present study, it might be inferred that the development of the lower incisor inclination and TMJ noise might reflect the accumulated mechanical force resulting from mandibular parafunctions. In addition, not only attrition, which was pointed out by Buyle‐Bodin, Lund & Robinson (1986) to play an important role in the development of the anterior guidance, but also the mesiodistal tilting of anterior teeth was suggested to be of importance in the developmental process of the anterior guidance from the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Therefore, from the results of the present study, it might be inferred that the development of the lower incisor inclination and TMJ noise might reflect the accumulated mechanical force resulting from mandibular parafunctions. In addition, not only attrition, which was pointed out by Buyle‐Bodin, Lund & Robinson (1986) to play an important role in the development of the anterior guidance, but also the mesiodistal tilting of anterior teeth was suggested to be of importance in the developmental process of the anterior guidance from the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Later studies have proposed values between 5° and 10° difference [12,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, in contrast to this different researchers have refuted any correlation between the condylar inclination path and the guiding or wear surfaces of the maxillary teeth [29][30][31][32], the main argument being that condylar rotation during translation allows the TMJ to adapt to different anterior inclination paths. Hence, two different schools of thought can be found in the literature: one that supports the idea of an anatomofunctional interrelationship between the articular and the occlusal determinants of mandibular movement and a second that believes these two are independent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%