2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-4989-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine dirofilariosis endemic in Central Europe—10 years of epidemiological study in Slovakia

Abstract: The study presents the comprehensive results of a detailed epidemiological study on canine dirofilariosis in Slovakia, Central Europe. More than 4000 dogs were investigated, and several epidemiological factors were considered. The mean prevalence in individual regions ranged from 2.0 % in northern Slovakia to more than 25.0 % in the south-western part of the country, with the nematode Dirofilaria repens confirmed as the dominant causative agent. Canine dirofilariosis occurred more often in animals more than 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, countries most commonly mentioned in the history of dogs infected with D. repens were Hungary, Slovakia and eastern Austria, which are again endemic regions for this infection (Tolnai et al 2014;Fuehrer et al 2016;Miterpáková et al 2016). These results are only partly consistent with a German study from 2011, where most infections with D. repens were imported from Hungary, Greece and Italy (Pantchev et al 2011).All countries mentioned are neighbouring countries of Austria or frequently visited travel destinations and are strongly represented by animal welfare organisations bringing shelter and stray dogs to Austria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In the present study, countries most commonly mentioned in the history of dogs infected with D. repens were Hungary, Slovakia and eastern Austria, which are again endemic regions for this infection (Tolnai et al 2014;Fuehrer et al 2016;Miterpáková et al 2016). These results are only partly consistent with a German study from 2011, where most infections with D. repens were imported from Hungary, Greece and Italy (Pantchev et al 2011).All countries mentioned are neighbouring countries of Austria or frequently visited travel destinations and are strongly represented by animal welfare organisations bringing shelter and stray dogs to Austria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…A possibility is that they were introduced from a neighbouring country where they had been reported. In a long-term monitoring carried out in Slovakia between 2005 and 2015, D. immitis was detected in 10 dogs of which 9 had mixed infection, and some autochthonous cases were revealed in the Komárno district, close to the border of Hungary (Čabanová et al 2015;Miterpáková et al 2016). In Serbia, a high prevalence of both species had been found in dogs (Tasić et al 2008(Tasić et al , 2012Krstić et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest prevalence of D. immitis was found in the Canary Islands and Madeira and in Mediterranean countries (22–40%). Prevalence of D. repens ranged from 23 to 49% in Southwestern Russia and from 25% to 38% in some central and northern European countries [6, 4042]. In Iran, China, and India, prevalence rates between 15 and 60% for both species have been reported [6, 4347].…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%