2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00398.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine diabetes mellitus: from phenotype to genotype

Abstract: Breed differences in susceptibility to diabetes mellitus in dogs suggest an underlying genetic component to the pathogenesis of the disease. There is little evidence for an equivalent of human type 2 diabetes in dogs, and it has been proposed that canine diabetes is more comparable to the type 1 form of the disease. Certain immune response genes, particularly those encoding major histocompatibility complex molecules involved in antigen presentation, are important in determining susceptibility to human type 1 d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
1
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
65
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Porcine insulin was selected as the antigen for use in ELISA as it had been shown previously that there was a high correlation between AIA reactivity measured against bovine or porcine insulin and that there was antibody cross-reactivity between these two insulin types (Davison et al, 2003) Control dogs demonstrated negligible AIA reactivity, which might be expected since they have not been exposed to the antigen, over and above that present physiologically. However, a previous study reported AIA in 4 of 120 control dogs (Davison et al, 2008). This latter finding might represent false positives in the insulin ELISA, or might be due to the presence of insulin autoantibodies in dogs that were potentially in a pre-diabetic state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Porcine insulin was selected as the antigen for use in ELISA as it had been shown previously that there was a high correlation between AIA reactivity measured against bovine or porcine insulin and that there was antibody cross-reactivity between these two insulin types (Davison et al, 2003) Control dogs demonstrated negligible AIA reactivity, which might be expected since they have not been exposed to the antigen, over and above that present physiologically. However, a previous study reported AIA in 4 of 120 control dogs (Davison et al, 2008). This latter finding might represent false positives in the insulin ELISA, or might be due to the presence of insulin autoantibodies in dogs that were potentially in a pre-diabetic state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It has been proposed that there are several potential underlying causes of diabetes in dogs, including immune mediated destruction of the beta cells of the pancreas, chronic pancreatitis and insulin resistance due to hormonal antagonism (Hoenig, 2002;Rand et al, 2004). Certain breeds of dog are predisposed to developing diabetes, which strongly suggests that there is a genetic component to disease susceptibility (Catchpole et al, 2008). Breeds such as the Samoyed, Tibetan terrier and Cairn terrier have an increased risk of developing diabetes, whereas other breeds, such as the Boxer and German Shepherd Dog have a reduced risk .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations