1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.324221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine detection odor signatures for mine-related explosives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Target odors that meet or exceed a threshold concentration will elicit a response from dogs trained to respond to that odor (Moulton 1975a, b, Waggoner et al 1997, Johnston et al 1998). Lewis et al (1997) reported a positive indication rate of only Ϸ60% for dogs tested with Þve termites compared with a positive indication rate of Ϸ98% when termite numbers were increased from 5 to Ն50.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target odors that meet or exceed a threshold concentration will elicit a response from dogs trained to respond to that odor (Moulton 1975a, b, Waggoner et al 1997, Johnston et al 1998). Lewis et al (1997) reported a positive indication rate of only Ϸ60% for dogs tested with Þve termites compared with a positive indication rate of Ϸ98% when termite numbers were increased from 5 to Ն50.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies from Auburn University have been conducted to ascertain the major odors found smokeless powders that are most identified by trained canines [69][70][71]. Initial instrumental examination of the volatile components of the powders returned four major odor components: acetone, toluene, nitroglycerine, and limonene.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, canines have been reliably trained to detect explosives, ignitable liquids, narcotics, human scent and the discovered evidence has been successfully submitted in court of law [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Despite canines' wide potential for detection in many areas, they are most commonly used for explosive detection as a result of the growing threat of terrorism.…”
Section: A Non-contact Passive Approach For the Effective Collection mentioning
confidence: 99%