2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2683-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine babesiosis in Romania due to Babesia canis and Babesia vogeli: a molecular approach

Abstract: Canine babesiosis is a tick-borne disease caused by the protozoa Babesia spp. that affects dogs worldwide. In Romania, canine babesiosis has become quite frequent in the last few years, with a wide variety of clinical signs, ranging from mild, nonspecific illness to peracute collapse, and even death. Traditionally, a Babesia infection in dogs is diagnosed based on the morphologic appearance of the intraerythrocytic piroplasms observed in peripheral blood smears. To date, no data on genetic characterization of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(45 reference statements)
4
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct blood PCR detected 26 % (39/150) positivity for babesiosis whereas, 18% (27/150) of samples were positive under microscopic examination (Ganguly et al, 2017). In comparison to microscopy, PCR detected more infection which is in agreement with the findings of other workers (Gotsch et al, 2009;O'Dwyer et al, 2009;Amuta et al, 2010;Ionita et al, 2012;Laha et al, 2014). The prevalence studies of B. gibsoni with PCR based assays were variable worldwide and ranging from 3.3 to 55% (Macintire et al, 2002;Inokuma et al, 2004;Talukder et al, 2012;Mokhtar et al, 2013;Laha et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Direct blood PCR detected 26 % (39/150) positivity for babesiosis whereas, 18% (27/150) of samples were positive under microscopic examination (Ganguly et al, 2017). In comparison to microscopy, PCR detected more infection which is in agreement with the findings of other workers (Gotsch et al, 2009;O'Dwyer et al, 2009;Amuta et al, 2010;Ionita et al, 2012;Laha et al, 2014). The prevalence studies of B. gibsoni with PCR based assays were variable worldwide and ranging from 3.3 to 55% (Macintire et al, 2002;Inokuma et al, 2004;Talukder et al, 2012;Mokhtar et al, 2013;Laha et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, recent studies by Łyp et al (13) revealed the presence of another genotype of the protozoa in Poland, which caused subclinical babesiosis in 10 dogs. Patients with this type of infection may serve as a source of Babesia parasite that is important from an epidemiological point of view (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babesia canis is the most commonly found species in temperate regions of Europe. Several studies have detected this species in dogs from Hungary, Croatia, Italy, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Portugal, Russia, Germany, Slovenia, France, Albania, the Netherlands, Norway (Solano-Gallego and Baneth, 2011) and Romania (Ionita et al, 2012). Babesia gibsoni infection has been described in some European countries using molecular methods: two dogs in Germany (Hartelt et al, 2007), four in Spain (Criado-Fornelio et al, 2003;Tabar et al, 2009), one dog in Italy (Trotta et al, 2009), 14 dogs in Romania (Imre et al, 2013) and six from Croatia were diagnosed with B. gibsoni subclinical infection (Beck et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%