2017
DOI: 10.18666/trj-2017-v51-i2-7969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine-Assisted Therapies in Autism: A Systematic Review of Published Studies Relevant to Recreational Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a comparison group, it could include children from the same study population, but who are on the waiting list to receive AAI. In addition, although our research substantially exceeded the average sample size of the previous literature (Hallyburton & Hinton, ; O'Haire, , ), large‐scale experimental designs should be used, with a larger sample from different therapeutic units in the country, to favour the generalisability of the results and provide a stronger evidence basis for the effectiveness of this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a comparison group, it could include children from the same study population, but who are on the waiting list to receive AAI. In addition, although our research substantially exceeded the average sample size of the previous literature (Hallyburton & Hinton, ; O'Haire, , ), large‐scale experimental designs should be used, with a larger sample from different therapeutic units in the country, to favour the generalisability of the results and provide a stronger evidence basis for the effectiveness of this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although the results were predominantly positive, in relation to social interaction, communication skills, the expression of positive emotions and the degree of stress, the author drew attention to the limitations of the studies, in the samples and at a methodological level, seeing AAI as a ‘potentially enriching’ therapy and complementary in nature for individuals with ASD. Similarly, in the systematic review by Hallyburton and Hinton (), the small sample size of the studies included limited the applicability of the identified findings. It only located two studies on the effects of therapy dogs on the population with ASD; the mean age of the participants was 10.2 years and the mean sample size was 12 participants (Hallyburton & Hinton, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…His documentation of his experiences in the book “Pet-Oriented Psychotherapy” later led to him being called the father of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) [ 2 , 4 , 6 ]. Since then, dogs have visited patients in hospitals [ 7 , 8 ] residents in nursing homes [ 9 ], and students in schools [ 10 ], and their popularity has expanded from mental health to include professional teams in physical [ 11 ], occupational [ 12 , 13 , 14 ], speech [ 15 ], recreational therapy [ 16 ] and other related disciplines [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies specifically related to AAI in therapeutic and educational settings with child and youth populations with disabilities, such as ASD and emotional disorders, primarily report positive or mixed outcomes. Unfortunately, researchers who have analyzed study quality report significant methodological weaknesses (e.g., lack of experimental control), reliance on indirect measurements and potentially biased informants, insufficient sample descriptions, reduced intervention replicability, and limited treatment fidelity measures across the spectrum of AAI (i.e., informal animal-assisted activities to highly structured animal-assisted therapies; Brelsford et al, 2017;Davis et al, 2015;Hallyburton & Hinton, 2017;Hill et al, 2018;Maber-Aleksandrowicz et al, 2016;O'Haire, 2013O'Haire, , 2017. Leaders in the field of AAI have acknowledged that there have been exaggerations of positive effects, an overlooking of negative or neutral findings, and misrepresentations of methodological strength (Fine et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%