Cane Yield and Sugar Recovery of Sugarcane Variety Larkana-2001 under Different Fertilizer Sources

Mahar, G M; ., U.A. Buriro; ., F.C. Oad; Shaikh, Sher Ali

doi:10.3923/ajps.2008.237.240

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All these characters responded well to organic fertilizer, while NPK fertilizers proved their superiority in relation to fulfillment of nutrient requirements of the crop. These results are in confirmation with Mahar (2008). Higher value of juice weight due to production of homogenous population and uniform maturity resulting in better quality.…”

Section: Brix Percentage and Juice Weightsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…The maximum girth of 13.77 cm was recorded in planting single chip bud seedlings along with application of 363 100 per cent of recommended dose of N, P and 125 per cent of K + vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1. Similar findings were reported by Mahar (2008). Abbasi (2005) also stated that increased cane girth was relatively associated with optimum NPK fertilizers and organic fertilizer sources.…”

Section: Cane Length and Girthsupporting

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of Planting Materials and Nutrient Levels in Chewing Cane (Saccharum officinarum)

Bhanupriya¹,

Singh²,

Ramessh³

2011

MAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, during 2012-2013 to evaluate the performance of planting materials and nutrient levels in chewing cane. (Saccharum officinarum). The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with three replications. The treatments evaluated were planting materials of single budded setts (M 1 ), double budded setts (M 2 ), single chip bud seedlings (M3 ) under factor I and the nutrient levels viz., application of 100 per cent RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 (S 1 ), 75 per cent RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 (S 2 ), 50 per cent RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 (S 3 ), 100 per cent recommended dose of N, P and 125 per cent K + vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 (S 4 ), 75 per cent of N, P and 125 per cent K + vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 (S 5 ) under factor II. The recommended dose of sugarcane is 275:62.5:112.5 kg NPK ha -1 . The result revealed that among the planting materials, single chip bud seedlings recorded the highest cane yield. Regarding the nutrient levels, application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N, P and 125 per cent K + vermicompost @ 5 t ha -1 recorded the best results. Regarding the interaction, the combination of planting single chip bud seedlings along with application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N, P and 125 per cent K + vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 recorded the highest cane yield. All the growth attributes showed the similar results.

show abstract

Section: Brix Percentage and Juice Weightsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Cane Length and Girthsupporting

confidence: 84%

Evaluation of Planting Materials and Nutrient Levels in Chewing Cane (Saccharum officinarum)

Bhanupriya¹,

Singh²,

Ramessh³

2011

MAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mahar et al (2008) reported that NPK at rate of 225-112-168 kg/ha prove to be more effective to produce significantly greater and better brix%. Note: The symbols: (*) = Significant, (**) = High significant and (N.S) = Not significant Concerning the influence of the studied sugarcane varieties, the obtained results in Table 8 pointed out that brix percentage was significantly affected by the studied sugarcane varieties in the first and the second growing seasons.…”

Section: Juice Quality Traits: a Brix Reading (Tss %)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Chemical Properties and Juice Quality of Three Sugarcane Varieties as Affected by Gypsum, Filter Mud Cake and Inorganic Fertilization

2017

AJAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A field experiment was conducted at Mallawi Agriculture Research Station Farm -El-Minia Governorate, Egypt in two successive seasons of 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 (plant crops) to find out the influence of gypsum, filter mud cake with inorganic fertilization on chemical composition and juice quality of three sugarcane varieties. The obtained results could be summarized as follow:Gypsum rates had insignificant effect on leaves consists of P and K and significantly on the percentages of N, S and Ca of sugarcane leaves in the both seasons. Each increment in gypsum rate was associated with a significant increase in juice quality (brix% and sucrose%) in the two seasons. Juice purity% and reducing sugars% significantly affected by gypsum rates only in the first season, but the same traits showed insignificant response to gypsum rates in the second growing season.As for, filter mud cake with inorganic fertilization, the data cleared that fertilization had a significant effects on the traits of N, P, K, S and Ca leaves consist, juice quality traits (brix, sucrose and reducing sugars percentages) in the first and the second growing seasons. Juice purity percentage significantly affected only in the 1 st season.Also, varieties differed significantly in respect to the traits of N, P and K leaves consists and brix% in the first and the second growing seasons, but had insignificant effect in respect of S and Ca leaves concentrations, purity% and reducing sugars% not only in the first season but also in the second one as well as it had significant effect on sucrose% in the second growing season.The second order interaction showed insignificant effects on N, P, S and Ca leaf concentrations, significant effect on brix and sucrose percentages in the first and the second growing seasons, while it showed significant effect in K concentration in the second season only, however it had a significant effect on purity and reducing sugars percentages only in the first growing season.

show abstract

Cane Yield and Sugar Recovery of Sugarcane Variety Larkana-2001 under Different Fertilizer Sources

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Evaluation of Planting Materials and Nutrient Levels in Chewing Cane (Saccharum officinarum)

Evaluation of Planting Materials and Nutrient Levels in Chewing Cane (Saccharum officinarum)

Chemical Properties and Juice Quality of Three Sugarcane Varieties as Affected by Gypsum, Filter Mud Cake and Inorganic Fertilization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About