2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CANDOCK: Chemical Atomic Network-Based Hierarchical Flexible Docking Algorithm Using Generalized Statistical Potentials

Abstract: Figure S1: Distribution of RMSD values (Å) for all ligand poses generated by CANDOCK for docked poses in the CASF-2016 benchmark for (a) rigid-protein docking, (b) semi-flexible protein, and (c) fully-flexible protein docking.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are continuing to enhance the virtual screening pipelines to model reality more accurately, with the goal of increasing compound-proteome signature comparison accuracy. For instance, we are exploring the use different molecular docking programs, such as CANDOCK 84,85 and AutoDock Vina, 86 to populate the compound-proteome interaction signatures. An updated version of the v1 pipeline, v1.5, with parameters optimized for scoring compound-proteome interactions, yields benchmarking performance that is 10% higher relatively at the top10 cutoff (12.8% for v1.5 versus 11.7% for v1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are continuing to enhance the virtual screening pipelines to model reality more accurately, with the goal of increasing compound-proteome signature comparison accuracy. For instance, we are exploring the use different molecular docking programs, such as CANDOCK 84,85 and AutoDock Vina, 86 to populate the compound-proteome interaction signatures. An updated version of the v1 pipeline, v1.5, with parameters optimized for scoring compound-proteome interactions, yields benchmarking performance that is 10% higher relatively at the top10 cutoff (12.8% for v1.5 versus 11.7% for v1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a useful theoretical strategy is to select promising conformations from the docking study. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that different programs and theoretical methods are available for docking purposes, and each docking program shows advantages and limitations to carry out docking studies and docking-based virtual screening [64][65][66][67]. On the other hand, Hou and co-worker recently illustrated that no single docking program has dominative advantages than other programs [60,67].…”
Section: Molecular Docking Of Polyhalogenated 44 -Bipyridines 1-6 Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, due to the novelty of the 4,4 -bipyridyl motif in this field, a blind docking [21] exploration was performed in order to inspect the disposition of all enantiomers (M) and (P) of compounds 1-5 and the achiral 6 into the whole TTR, focusing on the binding capability toward the T 4 pockets. Despite the fact that flexible docking is frequently used to model ligand-receptor complexes accounting for molecular flexibility [64,65], we do not consider protein flexibility herein, rather focusing on the capability of the new compounds to insert in the same T 4 binding cavity hosting T 4 , as derived from the selected crystal complex. For this purpose, the released crystal structure of TTR complex (PDB ID: 1ICT, chains ABCD) [2] from the RCSB protein databank (www.rcbs.org) was used.…”
Section: Molecular Docking Of Polyhalogenated 44 -Bipyridines 1-6 Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations