2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-009-9440-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candidate Genes Associated with Susceptibility for SARS-Coronavirus

Abstract: Assuming that no human had any previously acquired immunoprotection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) during the 2003 SARS outbreak, the biological bases for possible difference in individual susceptibility are intriguing. However, this issue has never been fully elucidated. Based on the premise that SARS patients belonging to a given genotype group having a significantly higher SARS infection rate than others would imply that genotype group being more susceptible, we make use of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single SARS study envisioned a broader role for genetic screening. 37 This study, which genotyped 100 laboratoryconfirmed SARS patients from the Chinese Han population in Taiwan, suggested that during a crisis, genetic screening could not only be helpful for identifying highly susceptible (high-risk) individuals for prevention efforts, but would also be useful for making staffing assignments, with the rationale that healthcare workers who were resistant to infection would be more suited to providing care. 38 Taiwan has genetic discrimination legislation, but many exceptions limit its scope, raising legal questions about whether genetic screening during an infectious disease crisis is permissible.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A single SARS study envisioned a broader role for genetic screening. 37 This study, which genotyped 100 laboratoryconfirmed SARS patients from the Chinese Han population in Taiwan, suggested that during a crisis, genetic screening could not only be helpful for identifying highly susceptible (high-risk) individuals for prevention efforts, but would also be useful for making staffing assignments, with the rationale that healthcare workers who were resistant to infection would be more suited to providing care. 38 Taiwan has genetic discrimination legislation, but many exceptions limit its scope, raising legal questions about whether genetic screening during an infectious disease crisis is permissible.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A homozygous mutation (dbSNP ID: rs2075761; JSNP ID: IMS-JST003521) at the amino acid position 53 (FGL2 G53E) appears to be weakly associated with level of nasopharyngeal shedding of SARS-CoV ( P = 0.041) [45] . Subsequent studies from the same group confirmed that FGL2 G53E was a dominant risk variant for SARS-CoV infection [46] . Individuals carrying this mutation had about 40% higher SARS-infection rate than those without this mutation ( P < 0.0001) [46] .…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies from the same group confirmed that FGL2 G53E was a dominant risk variant for SARS-CoV infection [46] . Individuals carrying this mutation had about 40% higher SARS-infection rate than those without this mutation ( P < 0.0001) [46] .…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD8 + and CD4 + T cells constitutively secrete FGL2 protein to induce an inflammatory response. Several disorders, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), abortion and allograft rejection, are correlated with FGL2 (Hsieh et al, 2010;Zhao et al, 2013). In the area of cancer research, previous studies have found that altered FGL2 gene expression contributes to immune surveillance evasion in murine renal carcinoma (Birkhäuser et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%