1982
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19821215)50:12<2780::aid-cncr2820501215>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candida infections in patients with acute leukemia: Ineffectiveness of nystatin prophylaxis and relationship between oropharyngeal and systemic candidiasis

Abstract: Ninety‐three hospitalizations of 70 patients, who underwent induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia to determine the effectiveness of oral nystatin in preventing oropharyngeal and systemic candidiasis were reviewed. Sixty‐two percent of patients who received prophylactic nystatin and 58% of patients who did not receive nystatin developed oropharyngeal candidiasis; 11% of patients who received prophylaxis and 21% of those who did not receive prophylaxis developed systemic candidiasis. The use of oral nystatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
4

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a potentially important observation since it has been shown that colonisation with Candida spp, particularly of multiple sites, is highly predictive of subsequent invasive candidiasis. [26][27][28][29][30] A similar significant reduction in colonisation was also noted in an earlier study with AmBisome in BMT recipients. 20 Interestingly, in neither study was a statistically significant reduction in infection rates seen as a result of reducing colonisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a potentially important observation since it has been shown that colonisation with Candida spp, particularly of multiple sites, is highly predictive of subsequent invasive candidiasis. [26][27][28][29][30] A similar significant reduction in colonisation was also noted in an earlier study with AmBisome in BMT recipients. 20 Interestingly, in neither study was a statistically significant reduction in infection rates seen as a result of reducing colonisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used as suspensions prepared in various ways and administered to patients orally (1,2,7,14,17). However, most of these studies failed to document a beneficial effect of NYS administration against systemic fungal infections (2,14,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Özellikle Otolog veya allogeneik kök hücre transplantasyonu uygulanan hastalarda mukozit derecesi ile sistemik bakteriyemi arasında direkt ilişki vardır. Öte yandan sistemik kandidiazis tespit edilen tüm hastalarda oral kandidiazisin de belirlenmesi kaynağın oral mukoza olabileceğini kuvvetle düşündürmektedir [10][11][12] Yüzeyel orofaringeal kandidiazis topikal nistatin ile tedavi edilebilir. Genellikle sistemik tedavi gerektirmez.…”
Section: Evre 5 öLümunclassified
“…Profilaktik oral flukonazol genellikle öneril-mekle birlikte profilaktik nistatin önerilmemektedir. 12 Oral kavitede viral enfeksiyon da gelişebilir. Bunlardan en sık görüleni herpes simpleks tip 1 reaktivasyonudur.…”
Section: Evre 5 öLümunclassified