2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CancerSubtypes: an R/Bioconductor package for molecular cancer subtype identification, validation and visualization

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
166
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we attempted to construct a novel molecular subtype based on both the 52 stroma‐related lncRNAs identified in this study and 100 TME genes. We chose three as the optimal clustering number (see Figure ) and samples were then divided into three distinct subtypes based on SNF‐CC approach (combination of ‘similarity network fusion’ method and ‘consensus clustering’ method) using ‘CancerSubtypes’ R package (Figure A). The survival analyses revealed a significant survival difference between the three subtypes: The relapse and death risks were highest in subtype 3, whereas subtype 2 showed the best prognosis (Figure B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we attempted to construct a novel molecular subtype based on both the 52 stroma‐related lncRNAs identified in this study and 100 TME genes. We chose three as the optimal clustering number (see Figure ) and samples were then divided into three distinct subtypes based on SNF‐CC approach (combination of ‘similarity network fusion’ method and ‘consensus clustering’ method) using ‘CancerSubtypes’ R package (Figure A). The survival analyses revealed a significant survival difference between the three subtypes: The relapse and death risks were highest in subtype 3, whereas subtype 2 showed the best prognosis (Figure B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the BRCA gene expression data from Zhang et al (2019), which includes clinical data, for survival analysis. We use the first predicted coding driver groups in Table 1, including FOS, MBD3, JUN, E2F6, MYB, and SPI1, and the Similarity Network Fusion (SNF) method (Xu et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2014) to cluster cancer patients (see Section 4 of the Supplement for the results with the second and the third driver groups). SNF takes expression of these genes (i.e.…”
Section: Identifying Coding and Mirna Cancer Driver Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we use the miRBaseConverter R package [35] to convert miRNA names to the latest version of miRBase. Finally, we use the FSbyCox function (a feature selection based on Cox regression model) from the CancerSubtypes R package [36] to identify significant miRNAs and mRNAs. After the feature selection, we identify expression data of 79 miRNAs and 1314 mRNAs in 753 breast cancer samples at a significant level (p-value < 0.05) in total.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%