2006
DOI: 10.1517/13543776.16.2.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer therapies targeted to the epidermal growth factor receptor and its family members

Abstract: This review will provide an overview of therapeutic strategies that are targeted to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) network of signal transduction, with a focus on EGFR itself and the closely related Her-2/neu/ erbB2 (erbB2) receptor. EGFR is the founding member of the erbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, type I membrane spanning proteins that bind a variety of peptide growth factor ligands and initiate signal transduction along multiple downstream pathways towards proliferation, survival and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PKs have been selected for the determination of an IC 50 profile of 1 because they are involved in malignant diseases and because they represent different PK families. As can be seen in Table , 1 is actually selective over the homologous TKs including EGF-R, ERbB2, TIE2, PDGFRβ, SRC, and FAK. , Compound 1 inhibited VEGF-R2/3 in the low nanomolar range, but compared to VEGF-R2, the kinases PDGFRβ inhibited in an almost 300-fold higher concentration (IC 50 = 6.8 × 10 -7 M), FAK (IC 50 = 9.7 × 10 -7 M) and the other PKs (EPHB4, IGF1-R, ABL1, INS-R, PLK1, CDK2/4, GSK3-β, NEK2, Aurora A/B 41 ) in only the micromolar range. In particular, the selectivity of 1 for VEGF-R2/3 over INS-R is important because a critical requirement for a PK inhibitor to be further developed is to avoid disturbing glucose homeostasis .…”
Section: Selectivity Profiling Ofmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The PKs have been selected for the determination of an IC 50 profile of 1 because they are involved in malignant diseases and because they represent different PK families. As can be seen in Table , 1 is actually selective over the homologous TKs including EGF-R, ERbB2, TIE2, PDGFRβ, SRC, and FAK. , Compound 1 inhibited VEGF-R2/3 in the low nanomolar range, but compared to VEGF-R2, the kinases PDGFRβ inhibited in an almost 300-fold higher concentration (IC 50 = 6.8 × 10 -7 M), FAK (IC 50 = 9.7 × 10 -7 M) and the other PKs (EPHB4, IGF1-R, ABL1, INS-R, PLK1, CDK2/4, GSK3-β, NEK2, Aurora A/B 41 ) in only the micromolar range. In particular, the selectivity of 1 for VEGF-R2/3 over INS-R is important because a critical requirement for a PK inhibitor to be further developed is to avoid disturbing glucose homeostasis .…”
Section: Selectivity Profiling Ofmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To date, many monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and EGFR‐binding fragments have been identified and developed 9. These exogenous ligands can be exploited either as tumor‐targeting devices for classical chemotherapeutics or as competitive inhibitors of endogenous ligands that can directly inhibit cell differentiation and proliferation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%