Cancer Survivors’ Receptiveness to Digital Technology–Supported Physical Rehabilitation and the Implications for Design: Qualitative Study

Abstract

Background Physical activity is associated with a positive prognosis in cancer survivors and may decrease the risk of adverse effects of treatment. Accordingly, physical activity programs are recommended as a part of cancer rehabilitation services. Digital technology may support cancer survivors in increasing their level of physical activity and increase the reach or efficiency of cancer rehabilitation services, yet it also comes with a range of challenges. Objective The aim of this qualitative study was to explore cancer survivors’ receptiveness to using digital technology as a mode of support to increase their physical activity in a municipality-based cancer rehabilitation setting. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 cancer survivors (3 males, 8 females, age range 32-82 years) who were referred for cancer rehabilitation and had participated in a questionnaire survey using the Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) questionnaire. Data analysis was based on the content analysis method. Results Two themes were identified as important for the interviewees’ receptiveness to using digital technology services in connection with their physical activity during rehabilitation: their attitude toward physical activity and their attitude toward digital technology–assisted physical activity. Our results indicated that it is important to address the cancer survivors’ motivation for using technology for physical activity and their individual preferences in terms of the following: (1) incidental or structured (eg, cardiovascular and strength exercises or disease-specific rehabilitative exercises) physical activity; (2) social or individual context; and (3) instruction (know-how) or information (know-why). Conclusions The identified preferences provide new insight that complements the cancer survivors’ readiness level and can likely help designers, service providers, and caregivers provide solutions that increase patient receptiveness toward technology-assisted physical activity. Combining digital technology informed by cancer survivors’ needs, preferences, and readiness with the capacity building of the workforce can aid in tailoring digital solutions to suit not only individuals who are receptive to using such technologies but also those reluctant to do so.

A Digital Coaching Intervention for Cancer Survivors With Job Loss: Retrospective Study

“…Many patients receiving active cancer treatment have associated toxicities that are known to impair short-term work ability [ 6 , 35 ], and these may not be immediately amenable to improvements in self-management. The results of this study complement other recent studies showing the receptiveness of cancer survivors to digital technology for the support of physical rehabilitation [ 36 , 37 ], along with demonstrated improvements in quality of life through digital support [ 38 ].…”

Breast Cancer Patients’ Experiences with Online Group-Based Physical Exercise in a COVID-19 Context: A Focus Group Study

“…In the case of cancer patients, cutbacks were made to the prescription of guided and supervised physical exercise, and certain clinical procedures were suspended or delayed [ 15 , 16 ]. Some studies have shown the importance of designing group-based physical activity programmes to promote mental health and resilience in cancer survivors [ 17 , 18 ]. However, studies on breast cancer patients undergoing active treatment have focused on the prescription of physical exercise in person both individually and in small groups [ 19 , 20 ].…”

The Relation of Attitude Toward Technology and Mastery Experience After an App-Guided Physical Exercise Intervention: Randomized Crossover Trial

“…An alternative cost-efficient means to provide guidance regarding physical exercise is via digital apps on tablet computers. As tablets are highly mobile, they can be conveniently used in locations that allow to exercise [ 12 - 16 ]. They have a screen of sufficient size for video-based instructions and most importantly, older people are more likely to use tablets than smartphones [ 17 ].…”