2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Screening in Patients with Unprovoked Thromboembolism: How to do it and Who Benefits?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding raises the question of whether screening patients with venous thromboembolism for underlying cancer would be beneficial. Multiple studies investigated screening protocols regarding unprovoked VTEs and looked at limited screening (blood count, kidney function, ionogram, and chest x-ray) versus extended screening (ultrasound, CT, positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, endoscopy) [14,15]. In the study conducted by Ferreira et al, they developed a protocol that looks at patient risk factors, clinical history, physical examination, general laboratory results, imaging results, and Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) score to determine if a patient should undergo limited or extended screening following unprovoked VTE [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding raises the question of whether screening patients with venous thromboembolism for underlying cancer would be beneficial. Multiple studies investigated screening protocols regarding unprovoked VTEs and looked at limited screening (blood count, kidney function, ionogram, and chest x-ray) versus extended screening (ultrasound, CT, positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, endoscopy) [14,15]. In the study conducted by Ferreira et al, they developed a protocol that looks at patient risk factors, clinical history, physical examination, general laboratory results, imaging results, and Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) score to determine if a patient should undergo limited or extended screening following unprovoked VTE [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies investigated screening protocols regarding unprovoked VTEs and looked at limited screening (blood count, kidney function, ionogram, and chest x-ray) versus extended screening (ultrasound, CT, positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, endoscopy) [14,15]. In the study conducted by Ferreira et al, they developed a protocol that looks at patient risk factors, clinical history, physical examination, general laboratory results, imaging results, and Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) score to determine if a patient should undergo limited or extended screening following unprovoked VTE [15]. While this approach may aid in the earlier identification of patients with cancer, it may not detect cancer in the absence of a primary lesion unless a PET scan is utilized in the screening process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation