1994
DOI: 10.2307/3431951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Risk of Air Pollution: Epidemiological Evidence

Abstract: Epidemiological studies on the effect of urban air pollution on lung cancer were surveyed. Overall, the studies from many countries point to a smoking-adjusted risk in urban areas over countryside areas that is higher by a factor of up to 1.5. The extent to which urban air pollution contributes to this excess remains unknown. Studies on diesel-exposed occupational groups show that urban air pollution may have a causative role in lung cancer. Model calculations on unit risk factors of known human carcinogens we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the statement that cancer risks under conditions of exposure to moderate or low pollution levels are currently less clear and often contradictory, with some epidemiological studies showing a lack of association and others showing increased risks of up to approximately 1.5 times (Hemminki and Pershagen, 1994). It is possible that the residue levels of PTSs in this industrial area had not reached the level that would increase the risk of having cancer, and it is speculated that air particles, diet, etc., can be the primary means of PTS exposure to humans in the chemical industry park (Abrahams, 2002).…”
Section: Impacting Factors On Human Healthsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This agrees with the statement that cancer risks under conditions of exposure to moderate or low pollution levels are currently less clear and often contradictory, with some epidemiological studies showing a lack of association and others showing increased risks of up to approximately 1.5 times (Hemminki and Pershagen, 1994). It is possible that the residue levels of PTSs in this industrial area had not reached the level that would increase the risk of having cancer, and it is speculated that air particles, diet, etc., can be the primary means of PTS exposure to humans in the chemical industry park (Abrahams, 2002).…”
Section: Impacting Factors On Human Healthsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Nonetheless, these estimates suggest a considerable risk associated with exposure to PAHs, especially in light of the fact that the U.S. EPA considers a cancer risk of between 1 in 100,000-1,000,000 as not significant; the State of California's Proposition 65 program (State of California 1986) uses 1 in 100,000 as the no-significant-risk level. This estimate can be compared with an estimate of cancer risk associated with urban life in industrialized nations (Hemminki and Pershagen 1994). These workers calculated a risk of one cancer case per million people per year among urban residents exposed to an average ambient air concentration of 0.7 ng BaP/m 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of this cancer is probably due to carcinogenic air pollutants, although a higher rate of smoking in cities and other factors also contribute (Ehrenberg et al 1985;Hemminki and Pershagen 1994;Törnqvist and Ehrenberg 1994). For the pollution levels prevailing around 1980, it has been estimated that approximately 100 cases of lung cancer annually in Sweden (out of 2,500) are related to carcinogenic air pollutants that originate mainly from different combustion sources (Swedish Cancer Committee 1984).…”
Section: Pahs In Ambient Airmentioning
confidence: 99%