2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08380-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer risk in adrenalectomy: are adrenal lesions equal or more than 4 cm a contraindication for laparoscopy?

Abstract: Background Some authors consider adrenal lesions size of less than 4 cm as a positive cut-off limit to set the indications for minimally invasive surgery due to a lower risk of malignancy. Aim of this study is to report the risk of cancer for adrenal lesions measuring 4 cm or more in diameter, assessed as benign at preoperative workup (primary outcome), and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in these cases (secondary outcome). Meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prefer the anterior transperitoneal approach for right adrenalectomy and the anterior transperitoneal submesocolic approach for left adrenalectomy with patients positioned in the supine position [8–10]. To the best of our knowledge, the anterior approach is performed in very few centers around the world [9, 27–31]. This is in agreement with the lack of a clear superiority of one approach over the other in the literature [8–10, 13, 32], and the recommendations of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) that suggest the surgeon should employ the surgical approach for LA with which he or she is most familiar [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We prefer the anterior transperitoneal approach for right adrenalectomy and the anterior transperitoneal submesocolic approach for left adrenalectomy with patients positioned in the supine position [8–10]. To the best of our knowledge, the anterior approach is performed in very few centers around the world [9, 27–31]. This is in agreement with the lack of a clear superiority of one approach over the other in the literature [8–10, 13, 32], and the recommendations of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) that suggest the surgeon should employ the surgical approach for LA with which he or she is most familiar [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%